0
Article Tier 2 Detection Methods Remediation Sign in to save

Comparison and uncertainty evaluation of two centrifugal separators for microplastic sampling

Journal of Hazardous Materials 2021 47 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared a hydrocyclone and a continuous flow centrifuge as alternative centrifugal separators for small microplastic sampling from estuarine waters, finding both methods effective with microplastic concentrations ranging from 193 to 2,072 particles/m3 across sampling sites.

For commonly applied microplastic sampling approaches based on filtration, high throughput and no size-discrimination are conflicting goals. Therefore, we propose two efficient centrifugal separators for small microplastic sampling, namely the utilization of a hydrocyclone as well as a continuous flow centrifuge. Thorough method optimization was followed by application in an extensive sampling study to investigate the separators' retention behavior for particulate plastics from estuarine waters. Microplastic concentrations ranged from 193 to 2072 particles m-3. The most dominant identified polymer types were polypropylene, acrylates, polyvinyl chloride and polyethylene. More than 95% of particles were < 100 µm. For the first time in microplastic research, an expanded uncertainty was calculated according to the "Guide to the expression of Uncertainty in Measurement" (JCGM 100:2008). Bottom-up uncertainty evaluation revealed the different sampling methods (~ 44%), sample replicates (~ 26%) and the different detection techniques (~ 16%) as the major sources of uncertainty. Depending on the number of particles detected in the samples, the relative expanded uncertainty (Urel (k = 2)) ranged from 24% up to > 200% underpinning tremendous importance of sound uncertainty evaluation. Our results indicate that scientist should rethink many "observed patterns" in the literature due to being insignificant and herewith not real.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Evaluation of continuous flow centrifugation as an alternative technique to sample microplastic from water bodies

AI summary Read the abstract

Continuous flow centrifugation was tested as an alternative to traditional net trawling for sampling microplastics from water bodies and showed promising results, particularly for capturing smaller particles. Standardizing sampling methods is a critical step toward making microplastic studies more comparable across labs and locations.

Article Tier 2

Is There a Difference in Yield? A Comparative Analysis of Microplastics Sampling Techniques in River Water with a Low-Velocity Flow

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared three microplastic sampling techniques in low-velocity river water, quantifying differences in particle abundance and characteristics to evaluate which method most accurately captures microplastic concentrations in surface water environments.

Article Tier 2

Sampling microplastics in estuarine environments: lessons learned from suspended sediment dynamics and perspectives.

AI summary Read the abstract

This paper reviews the challenges of sampling microplastics in estuaries, where tidal flows and suspended sediment make collection methods complex and inconsistent. The authors call for standardized protocols that account for the unique dynamics of estuarine environments to improve comparability across studies.

Article Tier 2

Efficacy of Microplastic Separation Techniques on Seawater Samples: Testing Accuracy Using High-Density Polyethylene

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists tested four common methods for separating microplastics from seawater samples and found that each method recovered different amounts and types of particles. Standardizing separation methods is critical for making microplastic concentration data comparable across different studies.

Article Tier 2

Comparison of Different Procedures for Separating Microplastics from Sediments

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared three different methodologies for separating dense microplastics from fine sediments, finding significant differences in recovery rates and identifying contamination risks during the separation procedures.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper