We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comparative evaluation of high-density polyethylene and polystyrene microplastics pollutants: Uptake, elimination and effects in mussel
Summary
Researchers compared the accumulation, elimination, and biological effects of high-density polyethylene and polystyrene microplastics in mussels. Both types accumulated primarily in the digestive gland and gills and induced oxidative stress, though most particles were cleared after 144 hours of depuration. Metabolomic analysis revealed that the two polymers affected mussel metabolism differently, with polyethylene showing increased effects even during the elimination period.
The high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and the polystyrene (PS), which are typical microplastic contaminants, are frequently detected in the environment and have potential hazard to environmental health. In this study, the accumulation, elimination, tissue distribution and potential effects of the HDPE and the PS in the mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) were evaluated. The HDPE and the PS were found in various tissues (digestive gland > gill > gonad ≈ muscle) with no difference in distribution patterns. The accumulation of the HDPE and the PS rapidly increased in the first 48 h exposure, and the accumulation of HDPE was higher than that of PS. After 144 h of elimination, most of the HDPE and the PS were cleared by mussels. In addition, the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and the content of oxidized glutathione considerably increased, indicating that the HDPE and the PS induced oxidative stress and prevented oxidative damage in elimination. The metabolomic analysis suggested that exposure to HDPE and PS induced alterations in the metabolic profiles of mussel. Differential metabolites were involved in energy metabolism, lipid metabolism, tricarboxylic acid cycle and neurotoxic response., and Meanwhile, the PS had a lower effect on mussel metabolism during elimination, but the effect of HDPE was increased. Overall, this study elucidated that the HDPE and the PS caused adverse effects on the mussels and provided insights toward understanding the hazard of different microplastics on aquatic organisms.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Effects of polyethylene and polystyrene microplastics on bioaccumulation and toxicity of dibutyl phthalate in Mytilisepta virgata
Researchers investigated how polyethylene and polystyrene microplastics affect the accumulation and toxicity of dibutyl phthalate, a common marine pollutant, in mussels. They found that the type and aging state of microplastics influenced how much phthalate accumulated in the mussels' tissues, and that the accumulated pollutant persisted even after the exposure ended. The study suggests that while mussels can survive these exposures, they risk significant pollutant buildup and oxidative damage when microplastics and phthalates coexist.
Using marine mussels to assess the potential ecotoxicological effects of two different commercial microplastics
Researchers exposed marine mussels to polypropylene and polyethylene terephthalate microplastics for up to 28 days to evaluate ecotoxicological effects. They measured feeding rates, condition index, and various biochemical markers related to metabolism and oxidative stress. The study found measurable changes in the mussels' biological responses, suggesting that these common types of microplastics can affect the health of filter-feeding organisms in marine environments.
Chemical pollution and ecotoxicological effects of high-density polyethylene microplastics in Mytilus galloprovincialis from two Italian lagoon ecosystems
Researchers assessed microplastic contamination and chemical pollution in mussels from two Italian lagoon ecosystems and tested the effects of high-density polyethylene microplastic exposure. The study found microplastics present in mussels from one lagoon, and laboratory exposure to HDPE microplastics induced significant oxidative stress responses, suggesting these particles can cause ecotoxicological harm in transitional water ecosystems.
Accumulation, Depuration, and Biological Effects of Polystyrene Microplastic Spheres and Adsorbed Cadmium and Benzo(a)pyrene on the Mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis
Researchers found that mussels accumulated polystyrene microplastics in a size- and concentration-dependent manner, and that microplastics acted as carriers for the organic pollutant benzo(a)pyrene but not cadmium, with short-term exposure causing digestive gland alterations.
Insights into the uptake, elimination and accumulation of microplastics in mussel
Researchers investigated how mussels take up, eliminate, and accumulate high-density polyethylene microplastics smaller than 22 micrometers. They found that mussels cleared microplastics at the same rate as similarly sized food particles, but smaller particles (under 6 micrometers) were retained much longer in the digestive gland. After six days of depuration, about 85 percent of ingested microplastics were eliminated, but 2 to 6 percent remained embedded in digestive tissue, indicating that small microplastics can accumulate in filter-feeding organisms.