0
Article Tier 2 Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Nanoplastics Induce More Serious Microbiota Dysbiosis and Inflammation in the Gut of Adult Zebrafish than Microplastics

Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 2021 132 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared the effects of microplastics and nanoplastics on the gut health of adult zebrafish and found that nanoplastics caused significantly more severe disruption to gut microbial communities and inflammation. Even at low concentrations, nanoplastics altered the abundance of beneficial and harmful gut bacteria more dramatically than larger microplastic particles. The study suggests that smaller plastic particles may pose greater risks to digestive health due to their ability to penetrate tissues more easily.

Polymers
Body Systems

Microplastics (MPs) (< 5 mm) and nanoplastics (NPs) (< 100 nm) are emerging environmental pollutants and have been proved could cause a series of toxicity in aquatic organisms. In this study, the effects on gut microbiota of adult zebrafish exposed for 21 days to 10 μg/L and 1 mg/L of MPs (8 μm) and NPs (80 nm) were evaluated. We analyzed the intestinal microbial community of zebrafish using high throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene V3-V4 region and also performed transcriptional profiling of the inflammation pathway related genes in the intestinal tissues. Our results showed that both spherical polystyrene MPs and NPs could induce microbiota dysbiosis in the gut of zebrafish. The flora diversity of gut microbiota significantly increased under a high concentration of NPs. At the phylum level, the abundance of Proteobacteria increased significantly and the abundance of Fusobacteria, Firmicutes and Verrucomicrobiota decreased significantly in the gut after 21-day exposure to 1 mg/L of both MPs and NPs. Furthermore, interestingly, the abundance of Actinobacteria decreased in the MPs treatment groups but increased in the NPs treatment groups. At the genus level, revealed that the relative abundance of Aeromonas significantly increased both in the MPs and NPs treatment groups. Moreover, it was observed that NPs increased mRNA levels of il8, il10, il1β and tnfα in the gut, but not in MPs exposure group, indicating that the NPs may have a more serious effect on the gut of zebrafish than MPs to induce microbiota dysbiosis and inflammation in the gut.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Distinct Effects between Polystyrene Micro- and Nanoplastics: Exacerbation of Adverse Outcomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease-like Zebrafish and Mice

AI summary Read the abstract

This study compared the effects of micro-sized versus nano-sized polystyrene plastics in zebrafish and mice with inflammatory bowel disease. Nanoplastics caused significantly worse gut inflammation, barrier damage, and immune disruption than larger microplastics in both species. The findings suggest that people with existing digestive conditions like IBD may be especially vulnerable to nanoplastic exposure from food and water.

Article Tier 2

Different effects of nano- and microplastics on oxidative status and gut microbiota in the marine medaka Oryzias melastigma

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared the effects of nanoplastics and microplastics on oxidative stress and gut microbiota in marine medaka fish. They found that nanoplastics caused more severe oxidative damage and greater disruption to the gut microbial community than larger microplastic particles. The study suggests that particle size plays a critical role in determining the biological impact of plastic pollution on aquatic organisms.

Article Tier 2

DistinctEffects between Polystyrene Micro- and Nanoplastics:Exacerbation of Adverse Outcomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease-likeZebrafish and Mice

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared the effects of polystyrene micro- and nanoplastics on a biological system, finding that nanoplastics caused more severe adverse effects than microplastics at equivalent mass doses, likely due to greater surface area and cellular penetration capacity.

Article Tier 2

Isolation and characterization of nanoplastics from the environment and their reproductive toxicity

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists found that nanoplastics—tiny plastic particles even smaller than microplastics—are better at sneaking into cells, sticking to food, and building up in the bodies of test animals like zebrafish, and they caused more inflammation and reproductive harm than larger microplastic particles in these studies. This matters because nanoplastics are already in our water and food supply, and their smaller size may make them more dangerous to our health than the microplastics we've been hearing about, though more research is needed to confirm these effects in humans.

Article Tier 2

The role of gut microbiota in mediating increased toxicity of nano-sized polystyrene compared to micro-sized polystyrene in mice

AI summary Read the abstract

This mouse study found that nano-sized polystyrene plastics were significantly more toxic than micro-sized ones, causing greater gut inflammation, liver damage, and metabolic disruption. The key difference was driven by how each size affected gut bacteria: nanoplastics caused a more severe shift toward harmful bacteria and away from beneficial ones. The findings suggest that the smallest plastic particles may pose the greatest health risk because they more dramatically disrupt the gut microbiome.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper