0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Evaluation of poly(styrene-d5) and poly(4-fluorostyrene) as internal standards for microplastics quantification by thermoanalytical methods

Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 2021 50 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Georg Dierkes, Tim Lauschke, Georg Dierkes, Georg Dierkes, Tim Lauschke, Tim Lauschke, Georg Dierkes, Georg Dierkes, Tim Lauschke, Georg Dierkes, Georg Dierkes, Georg Dierkes, Tim Lauschke, Georg Dierkes, Peter Schweyen, Peter Schweyen, Tim Lauschke, Thomas A. Ternes Georg Dierkes, Georg Dierkes, Georg Dierkes, Thomas A. Ternes Georg Dierkes, Thomas A. Ternes Thomas A. Ternes Thomas A. Ternes Peter Schweyen, Georg Dierkes, Georg Dierkes, Georg Dierkes, Thomas A. Ternes Thomas A. Ternes Thomas A. Ternes Georg Dierkes, Georg Dierkes, Georg Dierkes, Thomas A. Ternes Georg Dierkes, Georg Dierkes, Georg Dierkes, Tim Lauschke, Thomas A. Ternes Georg Dierkes, Georg Dierkes, Tim Lauschke, Georg Dierkes, Thomas A. Ternes Georg Dierkes, Georg Dierkes, Georg Dierkes, Georg Dierkes, Georg Dierkes, Georg Dierkes, Thomas A. Ternes

Summary

Deuterated polystyrene and fluorinated polystyrene were evaluated as internal standards for quantifying microplastics by pyrolysis-GC/MS, with both performing well for polystyrene quantification but with caveats about matrix effects in complex environmental samples, providing a foundation for standardized thermoanalytical microplastic quantification.

Thermoanalytical methods such as pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC-MS) are among the most promising techniques for the quantification of microplastics (MP) in environmental samples. However, methods still lack harmonization and standardization. The use of an internal standard (IS) can improve the quality of quantitative data and the robustness of the analytical method. Poly(styrene-d5) has frequently been used as IS for MP quantification, but suffers from H–D exchange during pyrolysis, which is catalyzed by inorganic components of the sample matrix, most evidently in aluminum oxide filter matrix and in sea sand. Poly(4-fluorostyrene) (PFS) is a promising alternative, which does not suffer from exchange reactions. Both standards yielded comparable results in calibrations for polypropylene, polyethylene, and polystyrene MP, but a larger concentration range could be covered if PFS was used. Only minor interferences of both polymers with natural organic matrix components were observed. The study of influences of various inorganic matrices on pyrolysis of the polymers revealed manifold effects that may interfere with MP quantification and underline the need for matrix-matched calibration or extensive sample clean-up.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper