0
Article Tier 2 Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

The issue of microplastic in the oceans: Preferences and willingness to pay to tackle the issue in Australia

Marine Policy 2021 28 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Tiny plastic bits from the ocean end up in fish, and possibly in the food we eat, though scientists are still studying the health effects. This study found that most people in New South Wales, Australia, actually support paying an annual household fee to help reduce ocean microplastic pollution, showing real public appetite for action on this issue.

Microplastic is becoming a more and more tangible problem worldwide. Wildlife, including fish of any size, ingests tiny particles of plastic that may end up in human bodies via food chain. While literature still debates on the potential harm to humans, it is evident that microplastic is damaging the marine ecosystem. Policy makers around the world have the duty to reduce, if not to eliminate, microplastic pollution on beaches and oceans. Many countries, including Australia, have moved first steps in this direction, however the challenge remains enormous. At present, there exists no market to reveal the preferences for reducing microplastic in the world’s oceans, nor to determine whether people are willing to play a role in such a reduction. This research investigates the preferences for management policies tackling the issue of microplastic in the ocean off New South Wales (Australia) by means of a stated preference experiment. Findings suggest that residents of NSW would support policies that focus on microplastic pollution reduction and would be willing to contribute financially paying a yearly household levy. Via a latent class model, the paper supports policy makers by providing information specific to different clusters within the population, identifying three segments with preferences spanning from “very caring of the marine environment” to “not caring at all of the marine environment”.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Are the public willing to pay to curb the emerging threat of microplastic pollution?

AI summary Read the abstract

This entry appears to be an abstract listing or index record for a study on public willingness to pay for measures to reduce microplastic pollution. Insufficient detail is available to summarise the full findings.

Article Tier 2

Preferences for microplastic marine pollution management strategies: An analysis of barriers and enablers for more sustainable choices

AI summary Read the abstract

This survey-based study examined Australian consumers' preferences for microplastic marine pollution management strategies, finding that cost and product trust are key barriers to adopting lower-microplastic products, and that willingness to pay for marine protection has limits.

Article Tier 2

Perceptions about potential microplastic interventions: a study on knowledge, concerns, and willingness to pay

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers surveyed Oregon residents about microplastic pollution and found that fewer than 25% were willing to pay full price for washing machine filters that capture plastic microfibers before they reach waterways, suggesting that government subsidies and targeted outreach to early adopters may be needed to scale up this promising pollution prevention tool.

Article Tier 2

What does the public think about microplastics? Insights from an empirical analysis of mental models elicited through free associations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers surveyed 2,720 Norwegians and found that the public primarily associates microplastics with ocean pollution and harm to animals, while awareness of microplastic sources and potential solutions remains low, with responses varying by age, gender, education, and personal values.

Article Tier 2

Willingness-to-pay for precautionary control of microplastics, a comparison of hybrid choice models

AI summary Read the abstract

A survey of UK adults found that people were willing to pay to reduce microplastic pollution and to resolve scientific uncertainty about its effects, with higher willingness to pay to reduce actual pollution than to simply gain information. Hybrid choice models revealed that respondents weighed irreversibility of harm more heavily than uncertainty itself.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper