0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Microplastics removal and characteristics of constructed wetlands WWTPs in rural area of Changsha, China: A different situation from urban WWTPs

The Science of The Total Environment 2021 99 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Yuannan Long, Yuannan Long, Xiaofeng Wen, Lingshi Yin Yuannan Long, Lingshi Yin Lingshi Yin Lingshi Yin Xiaofeng Wen, Xiaofeng Wen, Lingshi Yin Lingshi Yin Lingshi Yin Xiaofeng Wen, Zhenyu Zhou, Li Du, Yuannan Long, Xiaofeng Wen, Lingshi Yin Xiaofeng Wen, Xiaofeng Wen, Xiaofeng Wen, Lingshi Yin Xiaofeng Wen, Xiaofeng Wen, Lingshi Yin Xiaofeng Wen, Xiaofeng Wen, Xiaofeng Wen, Xiaofeng Wen, Xiaofeng Wen, Xiaofeng Wen, Xiaofeng Wen, Xiaofeng Wen, Zhenyu Zhou, Xiaofeng Wen, Xiaofeng Wen, Xiaofeng Wen, Ruihao Xiao, Xiaofeng Wen, Xiaofeng Wen, Xiaofeng Wen, Zhenyu Zhou, Zhenyu Zhou, Xiaofeng Wen, Ruihao Xiao, Lingshi Yin Lingshi Yin Xiaofeng Wen, Xiaofeng Wen, Xiaofeng Wen, Xiaofeng Wen, Li Du, Xiaofeng Wen, Xiaofeng Wen, Yuannan Long, Zhenyu Zhou, Xiaofeng Wen, Yuannan Long, Xiaofeng Wen, Xiaofeng Wen, Xiaofeng Wen, Ruihao Xiao, Lingshi Yin Xiaofeng Wen, Lingshi Yin Ruihao Xiao, Ruihao Xiao, Xiaofeng Wen, Ruihao Xiao, Zhenyu Zhou, Xiaofeng Wen, Xiaofeng Wen, Ruihao Xiao, Ruihao Xiao, Ruihao Xiao, Ruihao Xiao, Yuannan Long, Lingshi Yin Zhenyu Zhou, Xiaofeng Wen, Lingshi Yin Lingshi Yin Ruihao Xiao, Li Du, Ruihao Xiao, Xiaofeng Wen, Lingshi Yin Li Du, Lingshi Yin Xiaofeng Wen, Zhenyu Zhou, Yuannan Long, Yuannan Long, Lingwei Zhu, Ruihao Xiao, Xiaofeng Wen, Ruihao Xiao, Xiaofeng Wen, Xiaofeng Wen, Xiaofeng Wen, Xiaofeng Wen, Lingwei Zhu, Ruihao Xiao, Yuannan Long, Ruihao Xiao, Ruihao Xiao, Rongxuan Liu, Ruihao Xiao, Ruihao Xiao, Rongxuan Liu, Ruihao Xiao, Ruihao Xiao, Ruihao Xiao, Ruihao Xiao, Ruihao Xiao, Li Du, Qianhui Xu, Li Du, Ruihao Xiao, Ruihao Xiao, Ruihao Xiao, Ruihao Xiao, Xiaofeng Wen, Xiaofeng Wen, Lingshi Yin Ruihao Xiao, Qianhui Xu, Ruihao Xiao, Lingshi Yin Lingshi Yin Lingshi Yin Zhenyu Zhou, Zhenyu Zhou, Huiling Li, Xiaofeng Wen, Ruichuan Nan, Ruichuan Nan, Xiaofeng Wen, Lingshi Yin Lingshi Yin Yuannan Long, Shixiong Yan, Xiaofeng Wen, Lingshi Yin Lingshi Yin Xiaofeng Wen, Shixiong Yan, Lingshi Yin

Summary

Microplastic removal efficiency and characteristics were investigated in two rural wastewater treatment plants using horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands in Changsha, China, finding different removal efficiencies and polymer profiles compared to published data from urban treatment plants.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are important pathways that discharged microplastics into the natural environment, but few relevant research has been conducted in rural areas, especially with horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands (HSSFCWs). This study systematically investigates the removal efficiency and characteristics of microplastics in two rural WWTPs with HSSFCW in Changsha city of China and compared the microplastic pollution data of urban and rural WWTPs, to provide some advice for improving the microplastics removal efficiencies in rural WWTPs. 3 L wastewater were collected at each sampling point. Then microplastics in wastewater were extracted by density separation. The size, shape, color, and type of microplastics were analyzed and identified using the integrated microscope and FTIR. The whole experiment was carried out about a month. The results showed that the microplastics removal efficiency of rural WWTP1 was 72.38%, and that of rural WWTP2 was 68.10%, which were lower than that of most urban WWTPs. The microplastics removal efficiency of constructed wetlands in rural WWTP1 was 26.59%, and that in rural WWTP2 was 10.61%. Based on the daily discharge volume and the abundance of microplastics in the effluent of WWTPs, approximately 1.45 ∗ 107 items and 1.73 ∗ 107 items of microplastics were released each day from two rural WWTPs, separately. Fiber was the primary microplastic in both influent and effluent. The polyethylene (PE) and polystyrene (PS) were the main ingredients. The primary source of microplastics in rural WWTPs was inferred as domestic sewage. Microplastics removal efficiencies of rural WWTPs can be improved by regular maintenance, reducing the grid spacing, increasing the hydraulic stay time of biochemical pool, and increasing plant density, changing plant species, or adjusting the size and fill order of matrix in HSSFCWs, which can effectively help to prevent secondary pollution of microplastics from rural WWTPs.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper