0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Sediment-WaterInterfaces as Traps and Sources ofMicroplastic Fragments and MicrofibersInsights from StreamFlume Experiments

Figshare 2025
Uwe Schneidewind (17246578), Holly A. Nel (9300617), Jennifer Drummond (2513191), Anna Kukkola (14625813), Nicolai Brekenfeld (11163270), Andrew J. Chetwynd (3725710), Ben C. Howard (22520199), Valerie Ouellet (14071767), Katie Reilly (22520202), Mohammad Wazne (14625804), Chang Li (133800), Iseult Lynch (202013), Gregory Sambrook-Smith (22520205), Stefan Krause (473710)

Summary

Stream flume experiments with nylon microfibers and fragments showed that sediment type and particle size strongly influence microplastic deposition rates, with a stochastic modeling approach revealing that sediment-water interfaces act as both traps and temporary sources of microplastic pollution.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

Microplastic pollution has been found to negatively impact water quality and ecosystem health in numerous riverine environments at different spatial and temporal scales. However, many of the underlying principles controlling microplastic transport and retention mechanisms are still poorly understood. Here, we study the deposition behavior of nylon fibers and fragments (small and large) in flow-controlled stream flume experiments with gravel or mixed sediment. We use a stochastic modeling approach and Latin hypercube sampling to optimize the parameters describing microplastic deposition and resuspension and relate deposition rates to settling rates calculated using Stoke’s law. Our experiments show that lower streamflow velocity leads to faster microplastic deposition, an effect that is shape-dependent and more pronounced for fibers. In experiments with similar flow velocity, large fragments were more quickly deposited in flumes containing gravel compared to mixed sediment. Stoke’s settling rates and model-based deposition rates can differ by several orders of magnitude, especially for fibers. For our flume experiments, these differences are attributed to transitional and turbulent flow near the streambed. Results emphasize that microplastic net deposition and near-bed transport cannot be well described by Stoke’s law. Results will further our understanding of microplastic fate and transport in riverine environments.

Share this paper