0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Sediment-Water Interfaces as Traps and Sources of Microplastic Fragments and Microfibers─Insights from Stream Flume Experiments

ACS ES&T Water 2025 3 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Uwe Schneidewind, Holly Nel, Jennifer Drummond, Anna Kukkola, Nicolai Brekenfeld, Andrew J. Chetwynd, Ben Howard, Valérie Ouellet, Katie Reilly, Mohammad Wazne, Chang Li, Iseult Lynch, Gregory H. Sambrook Smith, Stefan Krause

Summary

Researchers used controlled stream flume experiments to study how microplastic fibers and fragments settle into riverbed sediments. They found that lower water flow speeds caused faster deposition, with the effect being strongest for fibers, and that traditional settling equations significantly underestimate how microplastics actually behave near the streambed. The findings improve our understanding of where and how microplastics accumulate in rivers.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

Microplastic pollution has been found to negatively impact water quality and ecosystem health in numerous riverine environments at different spatial and temporal scales. However, many of the underlying principles controlling microplastic transport and retention mechanisms are still poorly understood. Here, we study the deposition behavior of nylon fibers and fragments (small and large) in flow-controlled stream flume experiments with gravel or mixed sediment. We use a stochastic modeling approach and Latin hypercube sampling to optimize the parameters describing microplastic deposition and resuspension and relate deposition rates to settling rates calculated using Stoke's law. Our experiments show that lower streamflow velocity leads to faster microplastic deposition, an effect that is shape-dependent and more pronounced for fibers. In experiments with similar flow velocity, large fragments were more quickly deposited in flumes containing gravel compared to mixed sediment. Stoke's settling rates and model-based deposition rates can differ by several orders of magnitude, especially for fibers. For our flume experiments, these differences are attributed to transitional and turbulent flow near the streambed. Results emphasize that microplastic net deposition and near-bed transport cannot be well described by Stoke's law. Results will further our understanding of microplastic fate and transport in riverine environments.

Share this paper