We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Sediment-Water Interfaces as Traps and Sources of Microplastic Fragments and Microfibers─Insights from Stream Flume Experiments
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers used controlled stream flume experiments to study how microplastic fibers and fragments settle into riverbed sediments. They found that lower water flow speeds caused faster deposition, with the effect being strongest for fibers, and that traditional settling equations significantly underestimate how microplastics actually behave near the streambed. The findings improve our understanding of where and how microplastics accumulate in rivers.
Microplastic pollution has been found to negatively impact water quality and ecosystem health in numerous riverine environments at different spatial and temporal scales. However, many of the underlying principles controlling microplastic transport and retention mechanisms are still poorly understood. Here, we study the deposition behavior of nylon fibers and fragments (small and large) in flow-controlled stream flume experiments with gravel or mixed sediment. We use a stochastic modeling approach and Latin hypercube sampling to optimize the parameters describing microplastic deposition and resuspension and relate deposition rates to settling rates calculated using Stoke's law. Our experiments show that lower streamflow velocity leads to faster microplastic deposition, an effect that is shape-dependent and more pronounced for fibers. In experiments with similar flow velocity, large fragments were more quickly deposited in flumes containing gravel compared to mixed sediment. Stoke's settling rates and model-based deposition rates can differ by several orders of magnitude, especially for fibers. For our flume experiments, these differences are attributed to transitional and turbulent flow near the streambed. Results emphasize that microplastic net deposition and near-bed transport cannot be well described by Stoke's law. Results will further our understanding of microplastic fate and transport in riverine environments.
More Papers Like This
The role of biofilm and hydrodynamics on the fate of microplastic particles in rivers: an experimental study
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers conducted flume and field experiments to examine how biofilm formation and hydrodynamic conditions govern the fate of microplastic particles in rivers, investigating why some MP-polluted rivers crossing industrialized areas show no significant upstream-to-downstream concentration differences. The study identified biofilm-mediated density changes and turbulence as key factors controlling whether low-density MPs remain suspended or settle into sediments.
An experimental investigation of microplastic transport in fluvial systems
AI summary Read the abstract
This experimental study investigated the transport behavior of microplastics in a flume designed to mimic a river channel, testing particles of different sizes, shapes, and densities under various flow conditions. Researchers found that hydrodynamics, particle characteristics, and riverbed composition all interact to determine whether microplastics are transported downstream or deposited. The results provide mechanistic understanding needed to model microplastic transport in real river systems.
The effects of streambed movement and particle size on microplastic deposition
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers conducted flume experiments using polypropylene fibers and polystyrene microspheres in sandy streambeds to examine how streambed motion and particle size influence microplastic deposition, finding that both factors significantly affect burial rates in riverine systems.
The role of biofilm and hydrodynamics on the fate of microplastic particles in rivers: an experimental study
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers conducted experimental flume studies to investigate how biofilm formation and hydrodynamic conditions jointly govern microplastic particle fate in rivers, examining why some urbanized and industrialized river reaches show no significant upstream-to-downstream increase in microplastic concentration despite theoretical inputs.
Sediment-WaterInterfaces as Traps and Sources ofMicroplastic Fragments and MicrofibersInsights from StreamFlume Experiments
AI summary Read the abstract
Stream flume experiments with nylon microfibers and fragments showed that sediment type and particle size strongly influence microplastic deposition rates, with a stochastic modeling approach revealing that sediment-water interfaces act as both traps and temporary sources of microplastic pollution.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.