Article
?
AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button.
Tier 2
?
Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence.
Environmental Sources
Marine & Wildlife
Sign in to save
Microplastic in the coral reef environments of the Gulf of Mannar, India - Characteristics, distributions, sources and ecological risks
Environmental Pollution2022
79 citations
?
Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Score: 45
?
0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Jamila Patterson,
Jamila Patterson,
Jamila Patterson,
Jamila Patterson,
R.L. Laju,
Jamila Patterson,
Andy M. Booth
R.L. Laju,
Jamila Patterson,
Narmatha Sathish,
Jamila Patterson,
Andy M. Booth
K. Immaculate Jeyasanta,
Narmatha Sathish,
Narmatha Sathish,
Andy M. Booth
R.L. Laju,
Jamila Patterson,
Jamila Patterson,
Narmatha Sathish,
K. Immaculate Jeyasanta,
Narmatha Sathish,
K. Immaculate Jeyasanta,
K. Immaculate Jeyasanta,
Jamila Patterson,
K. Immaculate Jeyasanta,
K. Immaculate Jeyasanta,
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
J. K. Patterson Edward,
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
R.L. Laju,
Jamila Patterson,
J. K. Patterson Edward,
Jamila Patterson,
Jamila Patterson,
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
K. Immaculate Jeyasanta,
Andy M. Booth
K. Immaculate Jeyasanta,
K. Immaculate Jeyasanta,
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Jamila Patterson,
Jamila Patterson,
Jamila Patterson,
Andy M. Booth
Jamila Patterson,
Andy M. Booth
Jamila Patterson,
Jamila Patterson,
K. Immaculate Jeyasanta,
R.L. Laju,
R.L. Laju,
Jamila Patterson,
K. Immaculate Jeyasanta,
Jamila Patterson,
K. Immaculate Jeyasanta,
R.L. Laju,
R.L. Laju,
K. Immaculate Jeyasanta,
K. Immaculate Jeyasanta,
K. Immaculate Jeyasanta,
K. Immaculate Jeyasanta,
Narmatha Sathish,
K. Immaculate Jeyasanta,
K. Immaculate Jeyasanta,
K. Immaculate Jeyasanta,
Narmatha Sathish,
Narmatha Sathish,
Andy M. Booth
K. Immaculate Jeyasanta,
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Jamila Patterson,
K. Immaculate Jeyasanta,
K. Immaculate Jeyasanta,
K. Immaculate Jeyasanta,
K. Immaculate Jeyasanta,
Andy M. Booth
R.L. Laju,
R.L. Laju,
R.L. Laju,
R.L. Laju,
R.L. Laju,
R.L. Laju,
Narmatha Sathish,
Narmatha Sathish,
Narmatha Sathish,
Narmatha Sathish,
Narmatha Sathish,
Narmatha Sathish,
Narmatha Sathish,
Andy M. Booth
Narmatha Sathish,
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Jamila Patterson,
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Jamila Patterson,
Jamila Patterson,
Jamila Patterson,
Andy M. Booth
Jamila Patterson,
Jamila Patterson,
Jamila Patterson,
Jamila Patterson,
Jamila Patterson,
Jamila Patterson,
Jamila Patterson,
J. K. Patterson Edward,
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Jamila Patterson,
Jamila Patterson,
Jamila Patterson,
Jamila Patterson,
K. Immaculate Jeyasanta,
J. K. Patterson Edward,
J. K. Patterson Edward,
J. K. Patterson Edward,
J. K. Patterson Edward,
J. K. Patterson Edward,
J. K. Patterson Edward,
J. K. Patterson Edward,
R.L. Laju,
R.L. Laju,
Andy M. Booth
J. K. Patterson Edward,
Andy M. Booth
K. Immaculate Jeyasanta,
R.L. Laju,
R.L. Laju,
R.L. Laju,
R.L. Laju,
K. Immaculate Jeyasanta,
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
J. K. Patterson Edward,
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
R.L. Laju,
R.L. Laju,
Narmatha Sathish,
Andy M. Booth
Narmatha Sathish,
Narmatha Sathish,
Narmatha Sathish,
Narmatha Sathish,
Narmatha Sathish,
Narmatha Sathish,
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
J. K. Patterson Edward,
J. K. Patterson Edward,
Jamila Patterson,
J. K. Patterson Edward,
J. K. Patterson Edward,
J. K. Patterson Edward,
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
J. K. Patterson Edward,
J. K. Patterson Edward,
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
J. K. Patterson Edward,
J. K. Patterson Edward,
J. K. Patterson Edward,
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Andy M. Booth
Summary
Microplastic surveys in the coral reef environments of the Gulf of Mannar, India found that polyethylene and polypropylene were the dominant polymers, with land-based sources being the main contributor and pollution load indices indicating moderate to high ecological risk.
Microplastics (MPs; particles <5 mm) are widely distributed in various habitats from the land to the oceans. They have even reached the remotest of places, including the deep seas and Polar Regions. Although research on MPs pollution in the marine environment has received widespread attention in recent years, the distribution, sources and ecological risks of MPs in coastal areas remain unclear. This study assessed the abundance, characteristics, sources and ecological risk of MPs in surface waters and sediment of the mainland coast and four island groups comprising the coral reef environment of the Gulf of Mannar (GoM), southeast India. Mean MPs abundance across all 95 sampling sites ranged from 28.4 to 126.6 items L in water and from 31.4 to 137.6 items kg in sediment. MP fibers <2 mm dominated the water, while fragments >3 mm were predominant in sediments. Polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) were the most common polymers in both matrices. The major proportion of MPs in the GoM derived from land-based sources, with distance to the mainland, coastal population density and improper handling of solid waste being the main factors influencing the abundance of MPs. Polymer Hazard Index (PHI), Pollution Load Index (PLI) and Potential Ecological Risk Index (PERI) were used to assess current levels of MPs. While the GoM has high PHI values (>1000) resulting from MPs with high hazard scores (e.g. polyamide, polystyrene, polyvinyl chloride), the PLI values (1.46 and 1.51) indicate low MPs pollution levels in GoM waters and sediments, and the PERI values (31.7 and 24.4) indicate that this represents a minor ecological risk. The results from the current study enhance our understanding of the characteristics, sources, and associated environmental risks of MPs to marine ecosystems. This data may provide a baseline for future monitoring and the formulation of environmental policy.