We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Tracing microplastics from raw water to drinking water treatment plants in Busan, South Korea
Summary
Researchers traced microplastic contamination from raw water sources through drinking water treatment plants in Busan, South Korea. They found that while treatment processes removed a significant portion of microplastics, some particles still made it through to the finished drinking water. The study highlights the need for improved water treatment technologies to better address microplastic contamination in tap water.
The increasing amount of plastic waste has raised concerns about microplastics (MPs) in aquatic environments. MPs can be fragmented into nanoplastics that can pass through water treatment processes and into tap water; potentially threatening human health because of their high adsorption capacity for hazardous organic materials and their intrinsic toxicity. This case study investigates the identification, fate, and removal efficiency of MPs in Korean drinking water treatment plants. Two sites on the Nakdong River, two lake reservoirs (raw water sources), and four corresponding drinking water treatment plants were targeted to trace the amounts, types, and sizes of MPs throughout the treatment process. Monthly quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted by chemical image mapping using micro-Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. MPs larger than 20 μm were detected, and their sizes and types were quantified using siMPle software. Overall, the number of MPs in the river sites (January to April and October to November) exceeded those in the reservoirs, but only slight differences in the number of MPs between rivers and lake reservoirs were detected from June to October. The annual average number of MPs in River A, B and Lack C and D was not distinctively different (2.65, 2.48, 2.46 and 1.87 particles/L, respectively). The majority of MPs found in raw waters were polyethylene (PE)/polypropylene (PP) (> 60%) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET)/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) (20%), in addition to polyamide (<10%) in the river and polystyrene (<10%) in the lake reservoirs. Approximately 70-80% of the MPs were removed by pre-ozonation/sedimentation; 81-88% of PE/PP was removed by this process. PET/PMMA was removed by filtration. Correlation of MPs with water quality parameters showed that the Mn concentration was moderately correlated with the MP abundance in rivers and lake reservoirs, excluding the lake with the lowest Mn concentration, while the total organic carbon was negatively correlated with the MP abundance in both rivers (A and B) and lake reservoir C.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Tracking Microplastics Contamination in Drinking Water Supply Chain in Haikou, China: From Source to Household Taps
Researchers tracked microplastic contamination throughout the entire drinking water supply chain in Haikou, China, from source water to household taps. They found that while water treatment reduced some microplastic content, treated water actually showed higher concentrations than raw water, suggesting contamination during the treatment process itself. The study provides a health risk assessment indicating that microplastic exposure through tap water warrants continued monitoring.
Tracking microplastics contamination in drinking water in Zahedan, Iran: From source to consumption taps
Researchers tracked microplastic contamination through the entire drinking water system in Zahedan, Iran, from raw water sources to household taps. While water treatment plants removed 64-75% of microplastics, tap water actually contained more microplastics than the treated water, likely due to contamination from pipes and plumbing. Children were estimated to consume more microplastics per body weight than adults, highlighting concerns about drinking water as a source of microplastic exposure.
Microplastics and nanoplastics contamination in raw and treated water
Researchers analyzed 189 samples of raw, tap, and bottled drinking water for micro- and nanoplastic contamination. They found plastic particles in every sample tested, with raw water sources containing the highest concentrations and treated tap water containing the lowest, though contamination was never fully eliminated. The study suggests that current water treatment processes reduce but do not completely remove plastic particles from drinking water.
Identification of microplastics in conventional drinking water treatment plants in Tehran, Iran
Researchers identified microplastics in three conventional drinking water treatment plants in Tehran, Iran, finding that standard treatment processes do not fully eliminate particles down to 1 micron in size, raising concerns about microplastic exposure through tap water.
Removal efficiencies of microplastics of the three largest drinking water treatment plants in Bangladesh
Researchers evaluated the three largest drinking water treatment plants in Bangladesh and found that while conventional treatment removed a significant portion of microplastics, treated water still contained plastic particles. Removal efficiency varied depending on the treatment process used, with some plants performing better than others. This highlights that current water treatment infrastructure may not fully protect people from microplastic exposure through drinking water.