0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Food & Water Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Assessing exposure of the Australian population to microplastics through bottled water consumption

The Science of The Total Environment 2022 88 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Subharthe Samandra, Subharthe Samandra, Subharthe Samandra, Subharthe Samandra, Subharthe Samandra, Subharthe Samandra, Subharthe Samandra, Subharthe Samandra, Subharthe Samandra, Subharthe Samandra, Olivia J. Mescall, Olivia J. Mescall, Katie Plaisted, Katie Plaisted, Bob Symons, Amanda Ellis, Amanda Ellis, Bob Symons, Bob Symons, Katie Plaisted, Olivia J. Mescall, Shay Xie, Bob Symons, Olivia J. Mescall, Shay Xie, Bradley O. Clarke Shay Xie, Shay Xie, Shay Xie, Bradley O. Clarke Bob Symons, Bob Symons, Bradley O. Clarke Shay Xie, Bradley O. Clarke Shay Xie, Shay Xie, Amanda Ellis, Bradley O. Clarke Subharthe Samandra, Amanda Ellis, Bob Symons, Bradley O. Clarke Bradley O. Clarke Bradley O. Clarke Subharthe Samandra, Amanda Ellis, Bob Symons, Amanda Ellis, Bradley O. Clarke Bradley O. Clarke Bradley O. Clarke Bradley O. Clarke

Summary

Researchers analyzed 16 brands of bottled water sold in Australia and found microplastics present across all samples tested. The study identified polyethylene, polypropylene, and polystyrene particles, with concentrations varying between brands and water sources. The findings provide the first assessment of microplastic exposure through bottled water consumption for the Australian population and raise questions about the safety of this common drinking water source.

The presence of microplastics in the environment is substantially documented; however, the pathways of dietary exposure to microplastics are not yet well understood. This is the first study to document the presence of microplastics in bottled water sold in Australia from commercial outlets. In total, 16 brands of bottled water (Australian Sourced: n = 11, Imported: n = 5) sold in the two largest supermarkets in Australia were analysed in triplicate (n = 48) for the presence of polyethylene, PE; polystyrene, PS; polypropylene, PP; polyvinyl chloride, PVC; polyethylene terephthalate, PET; polycarbonate, PC; polymethylmethacrylate, PMMA; and polyamide, PA. Microplastics were detected in 94% (n = 15) of the samples, with PP (n = 14, 88%), PET (n = 10, 63%), PA (n = 7, 44%), and PE (n = 6, 38%) the most frequently detected. On average, a litre of bottled water contained 13 ± 19 (St Dev) microplastics, ranging from 0 to 80 microplastics/L. The average size of the microplastics identified in this study was 77 ± 22 μm. It was found that bottled water sourced and packaged overseas contained four times as many microplastics compared to bottled water sourced in Australia. It was estimated that in 2017, 28.3% of the Australian population consumed on average 30.8 L of bottled water; therefore, using the result from this study it is estimated that Australians are exposed to 400 microplastics annually through the consumption of bottled water. To understand the total amount of microplastics that Australians could be exposed to through dietary routes, further work is required to observe the presence of microplastics in other beverages and food.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper