0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Competitive and cooperative sorption between triclosan and methyl triclosan on microplastics and soil

Environmental Research 2022 18 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Xi’an Chen, Jingcheng Liang, Lijing Bao, Xuanning Gu, Simin Zha, Xingming Chen

Summary

Researchers investigated competitive and cooperative sorption between triclosan (TCS) and its metabolite methyl triclosan (MTCS) on polyethylene, polystyrene, and soil across a range of concentrations. They found that MTCS had higher sorption affinity than TCS on all sorbents, competitive sorption was concentration-dependent and most pronounced at low concentrations, and cooperative sorption occurred at high TCS concentrations on polystyrene and soil, with effects varying by pH.

Polymers

The sorption behavior of single contaminant on microplastics (MPs) has been extensively studied; however, little is known about that in the more actual scenario containing multiple contaminants. In this study, the interaction between triclosan (TCS) and its primary metabolite, methyl triclosan (MTCS) on polyethylene (PE), polystyrene (PS), and soil was investigated. Results indicate that the more hydrophobic MTCS had much higher sorption capacity and affinity than TCS. Competitive sorption between them occurred in most cases and appeared to be concentration-dependent (in the range of 0.1-5 mg TCS/L and 0.01-≤0.05 mg MTCS/L of primary solutes, respectively): more pronounced at low concentrations of primary solute, while progressively weaker with the increase of concentrations. Among the sorbents, MTCS exhibited strong antagonistic effect on TCS sorption for MPs, especially PS, while significant suppression of MTCS sorption by TCS took place for soil and PS rather than PE. Additionally, it is interesting to observe that the presence of TCS substantially facilitated the sorption of MTCS exclusively at high concentrations on both PS and soil, presumably attributed to the solute-multilayer formation. Furthermore, the magnitude of the two effects varied with solution pH: TCS sorption at alkaline pH was the most suppressed by MTCS because the less hydrophobic dissociated TCS tended to be displaced, and the highest cooperative sorption of MTCS with TCS occurred at acidic pH because neutral TCS preferentially adsorbed on sorbent surface could provide additional sorption sites for MTCS. Both competitive and cooperative effects between multiple contaminants may affect their fate and transport, thereby these findings are helpful for assessing the environmental risk of MPs and TCS in soil.

Share this paper