0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Planet compatible pathways for transitioning the chemical industry

2022 8 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Fanran Meng, Andreas Wagner, Andreas Wagner, Alexandre B. Kremer, Daisuke Kanazawa, Jane J. Leung, Peter Goult, Min Guan, Sophie Herrmann, Eveline N. Speelman, Pim Sauter, Shajeeshan Lingeswaran, Martin M. Stuchtey, Katja Hansen, Eric Masanet, André Cabrera Serrenho, Naoko Ishii, Yasunori Kikuchi, Jonathan M. Cullen

Summary

Researchers modeled seven planet-compatible transition pathways for the global chemical industry to 2050, finding that combining resource efficiency, circularity, and feedstock substitution interventions could reduce chemicals demand by 23-33% and require total investments of US$1.2-3.7 trillion, with demand-side measures being critical to managing constraints on biogenic and recyclate feedstocks.

Body Systems

Chemical products, such as plastics, solvents, and fertilizers, are essential for supporting modern lifestyles. Yet, producing, using and disposing of chemicals creates adverse environmental impacts which threaten the industry's license to operate. This study presents seven planet compatible pathways towards 2050 employing demand-side and supply-side interventions with total investment costs of US$1.2-3.7 billion. Resource efficiency and circularity interventions reduce global chemicals demand by 23–33% and are critical for mitigating risks associated with using fossil feedstocks and carbon capture and sequestration, and constraints on available biogenic and recyclate feedstocks. Replacing fossil feedstocks with biogenic/air-capture sources, shifting carbon destinations from atmosphere to ground, and electrifying/decarbonizing energy supply for production technologies, could enable net negative emissions of 200 MtCO2eq yr-1, while still delivering essential chemical-based services to society.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Global Plastic Industry Transition Addressing Key Drivers of the Triple Planetary Crisis

Researchers modelled global and regional transition scenarios for the plastic industry, integrating strategies to reduce fossil fuel dependence and shift to circular production models. They found that addressing plastic pollution, climate change, and biodiversity loss simultaneously requires a coordinated policy package across the full plastic value chain.

Article Tier 2

Chemicals management approach to sustainable development of materials

This review examines how chemicals management approaches must evolve for sustainable materials development, arguing that planetary boundaries and path-dependent industrial trajectories require rethinking how chemicals including plastics are produced and regulated.

Article Tier 2

Chemistry must respond to the crisis of transgression of planetary boundaries

This paper argued that chemistry as a discipline must urgently respond to the transgression of planetary boundaries, including those related to chemical pollution. The study outlined three steps: understanding the threats from a chemistry perspective, developing sustainable solutions through innovation, and transforming chemistry education and industry toward sustainability and circularity.

Article Tier 2

An anthropocene-framed transdisciplinary dialog at the chemistry-energy nexus

Researchers analyzed key molecules at the chemistry-energy nexus, including carbon dioxide, hydrogen, methane, ammonia, and synthetic polymers, within the planetary boundary framework. The study suggests that the energy transition will require major shifts in how these molecules are produced and used, with implications for reducing plastic pollution and other environmental impacts tied to the chemical industry.

Article Tier 2

GlobalPlastic Industry Transition Addressing KeyDrivers of the Triple Planetary Crisis

Researchers modelled global and regional transition scenarios for the plastic industry to address the triple planetary crisis of climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. They found that an integrated suite of policy measures—including production caps, extended producer responsibility, and recycling investment—is needed to achieve meaningful co-benefits across all three planetary challenges.

Share this paper