Image processing tools in the study of environmental contamination by microplastics: reliability and perspectives
Environmental Science and Pollution Research2022
27 citations
?
Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Score: 40
?
0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Maria Letizia Costantini,
Marco Matiddi
Tommaso Valente,
Tommaso Valente,
Tommaso Valente,
Tommaso Valente,
Tommaso Valente,
Tommaso Valente,
Tommaso Valente,
Marco Matiddi
Tommaso Valente,
Alice Sbrana,
Alice Sbrana,
Alice Sbrana,
Alice Sbrana,
Alice Sbrana,
Alice Sbrana,
Raffaella Piermarini,
Tommaso Valente,
Tommaso Valente,
Maria Letizia Costantini,
Tommaso Valente,
Daniele Ventura,
Maria Letizia Costantini,
Maria Letizia Costantini,
Daniele Ventura,
Alice Sbrana,
Alice Sbrana,
Tommaso Valente,
Tommaso Valente,
Tommaso Valente,
Tommaso Valente,
Tommaso Valente,
Cecilia Silvestri,
Marco Matiddi
Daniele Ventura,
Tommaso Valente,
Cecilia Silvestri,
Cecilia Silvestri,
Daniele Ventura,
Marco Matiddi
Tommaso Valente,
Marco Matiddi
Cecilia Silvestri,
Cecilia Silvestri,
Cecilia Silvestri,
Raffaella Piermarini,
Carlo Jacomini,
Marco Matiddi
Alice Sbrana,
Alice Sbrana,
Alice Sbrana,
Marco Matiddi
Maria Letizia Costantini,
Raffaella Piermarini,
Raffaella Piermarini,
Marco Matiddi
Raffaella Piermarini,
Cecilia Silvestri,
Raffaella Piermarini,
Raffaella Piermarini,
Cecilia Silvestri,
Cecilia Silvestri,
Cecilia Silvestri,
Raffaella Piermarini,
Marco Matiddi
Marco Matiddi
Cecilia Silvestri,
Marco Matiddi
Alice Sbrana,
Carlo Jacomini,
Marco Matiddi
Tommaso Valente,
Tommaso Valente,
Cecilia Silvestri,
Cecilia Silvestri,
Cecilia Silvestri,
Marco Matiddi
Alice Sbrana,
Alice Sbrana,
Carlo Jacomini,
Raffaella Piermarini,
Raffaella Piermarini,
Maria Letizia Costantini,
Cecilia Silvestri,
Maria Letizia Costantini,
Cecilia Silvestri,
Raffaella Piermarini,
Alice Sbrana,
Cecilia Silvestri,
Cecilia Silvestri,
Marco Matiddi
Daniele Ventura,
Marco Matiddi
Marco Matiddi
Marco Matiddi
Marco Matiddi
Marco Matiddi
Marco Matiddi
Marco Matiddi
Marco Matiddi
Cecilia Silvestri,
Marco Matiddi
Marco Matiddi
Cecilia Silvestri,
Raffaella Piermarini,
Marco Matiddi
Marco Matiddi
Cecilia Silvestri,
Marco Matiddi
Alice Sbrana,
Cecilia Silvestri,
Cecilia Silvestri,
Maria Letizia Costantini,
Daniele Ventura,
Marco Matiddi
Marco Matiddi
Marco Matiddi
Cecilia Silvestri,
Raffaella Piermarini,
Marco Matiddi
Cecilia Silvestri,
Marco Matiddi
Tommaso Valente,
Tommaso Valente,
Marco Matiddi
Alice Sbrana,
Cecilia Silvestri,
Marco Matiddi
Summary
Researchers assessed the reliability of image processing tools for studying microplastic contamination, finding that while these tools offer efficiency gains, inconsistent methodologies limit comparability between studies and call for standardization.
Microplastic pollution is one of the greatest environmental concerns for contemporary times and the future. In the last years, the number of publications about microplastic contamination has increased rapidly and the list is daily updated. However, the lack of standard analytical approaches might generate data inconsistencies, reducing the comparability among different studies. The present study investigates the potential of two image processing tools (namely the shapeR package for R and ImageJ 1.52v) in providing an accurate characterization of the shape of microplastics using a restricted set of shape descriptors. To ascertain that the selected tools can measure small shape differences, we perform an experiment to verify the detection of pre-post variations in the shape of different microplastic types (i.e., nylon [NY], polyethylene [PE], polyethylene terephthalate [PET], polypropylene [PP], polystyrene [PS], and polyvinylchloride [PVC]) treated with mildly corrosive chemicals (i.e., 10% KOH at 60 °C, 30% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> at 50 °C, and 15% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> + 5% HNO<sub>3</sub> at 40 °C; incubation time ≈ 12 h). Analysis of surface area variations returns results about the vulnerability of plastic polymers to digestive solutions that are aligned with most of the acquired knowledge. The largest decrease in surface area occurs for KOH-treated PET particles, while NY results in the most susceptible polymer to the 30% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> treatment, followed by PVC and PS. PE and PP are the most resistant polymers to all the used treatments. The adopted methods to characterize microplastics seem reliable tools for detecting small differences in the shape and size of these particles. Then, the analytic perspectives that can be developed using such widely accessible and low-cost equipment are discussed.