0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Food & Water Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Examination of Microcystin Adsorption by the Type of Plastic Materials Used during the Procedure of Microcystin Analysis

Toxins 2022 17 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Chan Seo, Joo Won Lee, Won‐Kyo Jung, Yoon-Mi Lee, Seungjun Lee, Sang Gil Lee

Summary

Researchers tested how well different plastic container and filter materials retain microcystins during sample preparation for water quality analysis, finding that polyethylene terephthalate containers had the best recovery rate (at least 81%) over 48 hours. The results show that plastic material choice in laboratory procedures can significantly affect the accuracy of microcystin measurements in drinking water.

The incidence of eutrophication is increasing due to fertilizer abuse and global warming. Eutrophication can induce the proliferation of cyanobacteria such as Microcystis, which produces microcystins. Microcystins are toxic to specific organs such as the liver and the heart. Thus, monitoring of microcystins is strongly required to control drinking water and agricultural product qualities. However, microcystins could be adsorbed by plastic materials during sample storage and preparation, hindering accurate analysis. Therefore, the current study examined the recovery rate of microcystins from six plastics used for containers and eight plastics used for membrane filters. Among the six plastics used for containers, polyethylene terephthalate showed the best recovery rate (≥81.3%) for 48 h. However, polypropylene, polystyrene, and high- and low-density polyethylenes showed significant adsorption after exposure for 1 hr. For membrane materials, regenerated cellulose (≥99.3%) showed the highest recovery rate of microcystins, followed by polyvinylidene fluoride (≥94.1%) and polytetrafluoroethylene (≥95.7%). The adsorption of microcystins appeared to be strongly influenced by various molecular interactions, including hydrophobic interaction, hydrogen bonding, and electrostatic interaction. In addition, microcystins' functional residues seemed to be critical factors affecting their adsorption by plastic materials. The present study demonstrates that polyethylene terephthalate and regenerated cellulose membrane are suitable plastic materials for the analysis of microcystins.

Share this paper