0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Remediation Sign in to save

Seasonal variation and complex analysis of microplastic distribution in different WWTP treatment stages in Lithuania

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2022 54 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Ieva Uogintė, Sonata Pleskytė, Julija Pauraitė, Galina Lujanienė

Summary

A seasonal 12-month monitoring study of a municipal wastewater treatment plant in Lithuania measured microplastic concentrations in wastewater and sludge through all treatment stages. Microplastics were detected throughout the plant with overall removal efficiencies above 90%, but seasonal variation in inflow concentrations reflected climate-driven changes in stormwater inputs.

Study Type Environmental

Industrial wastewater, domestic wastewater, and stormwater are the three entry points for microplastics (MP) in wastewater treatment plants. Extreme weather conditions, such as rising temperatures and heavy rainfall caused by climate change, can alter the rate at which MP enters wastewater treatment plants. In this study, wastewater and sludge samples from different treatment stages were collected during a 12-month sampling campaign (seasonal) to determine the efficiency of a municipal wastewater treatment plant in removing microplastic particles. MP ranging from 20 to 1000 µm were detected and classified by shape, color, size, and chemical composition. All samples contained MP particles, with concentration ranging from 1964 ± 50-2982 ± 54 MP/L in influent to 744 ± 13-1244 ± 21 MP/L in effluent and 91.1 ± 8-61.9 ± 5 MP/g in sludge; 71.6-90.1% identified particles were fragment-type with black, white, and transparent colors. Most of the microplastic particles were removed in the activated sludge tank, while the average removal rate in the wastewater treatment plant was 57%. The total concentration of MP was 27% higher in spring than in other seasons. The most common microplastic particles were polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polystyrene (PS), and polypropylene (PP). These results demonstrate the value of long-term monitoring and MP quantification, which would provide a more accurate estimate of MP pollution from wastewater treatment plants.

Share this paper