0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Sign in to save

Effect of sample presentation on the identification of polypropylene (PP), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and polystyrene (PS) using a portable near infrared instrument

Spectrochimica Acta Part A Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 2025 Score: 38 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Adam Kolobaric, Adam Kolobaric, Adam Kolobaric, Adam Kolobaric, Daniel Cozzolino, Louwrens C. Hoffman, James Chapman Louwrens C. Hoffman, James Chapman James Chapman Daniel Cozzolino, Daniel Cozzolino, Louwrens C. Hoffman, Louwrens C. Hoffman, Daniel Cozzolino, James Chapman Daniel Cozzolino, James Chapman Daniel Cozzolino, Daniel Cozzolino, James Chapman Daniel Cozzolino, Louwrens C. Hoffman, Daniel Cozzolino, James Chapman James Chapman

Summary

Researchers evaluated how sample presentation mode — ceramic, aluminium foil, or glass vial — affected the accuracy of portable near-infrared spectroscopy for classifying PP, PET, and polystyrene microplastics, finding classification accuracies ranging from 73-100% depending on the sampling mode used.

The quality of both the data and the sampling method plays an essential role in model development in near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy. Among the different factors, sampling presentation is key during the development of a NIR application, particularly when portable instruments are used to analyse microplastics (MP). The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of sample presentation mode (e.g. ceramic, aluminium foil and glass vial) on the classification of different MPs, such as polypropylene (PP), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and polystyrene (PS) using a portable NIR instrument. The results demonstrated that NIR spectroscopy could classify PP, PET, and PS microplastics, although classification accuracy varied depending on sample presentation. The PCA score plots showed differences between the sampling modes used to collect the spectra. Furthermore, the PLS models indicated that their performance depends on the sampling mode used where the coefficient of determination in cross-validation (R<sup>2</sup><sub>cv</sub>) ranged between 0.79 and 0.90. The results also showed that NIR spectroscopy was able to classify PP, PET, and PS with accuracies ranging from 73 to 100 %, depending on the sample presentation mode utilised. The development and implementation of rapid analytical methods, such as NIR spectroscopy, provides a non-destructive and green tool to identify the type of MP analysed.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper