We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Recent occurrence of microplastics in freshwater and efficiency of available treatment technologies
Summary
Researchers reviewed six years of global data on microplastics in freshwater systems, finding them in rivers, lakes, and groundwater across five continents, with conventional water treatment removing 85–95% of larger particles but struggling with smaller fragments. The review also found that nanoplastics may be 10–100 times more common than microplastics yet remain nearly impossible to detect with current technology.
This review assesses microplastic occurrence in freshwater systems globally between 2018 and 2024, examining spatial distribution patterns across rivers, lakes, groundwater, and wastewater treatment plants, alongside treatment technology efficiency. Studies were selected following PRISMA guidelines, with inclusion criteria requiring spectroscopic confirmation using ATR-FTIR or Raman spectroscopy and compliance with ISO/TR 21960 and GESAMP quality control protocols. Microplastics were detected across five continents with notable spatial variations: riverine systems showed mean concentrations of 0.5-5 particles/L, lakes exhibited 0.1-2.5 particles/L, whilst groundwater demonstrated significantly lower levels at 0.01-0.5 particles/L. The most prevalent polymers were polyethylene and polypropylene, primarily linked to secondary microplastic formation from consumer packaging degradation and agricultural film, whilst fibres (predominantly polyester and polyamide) originated from textile washing effluents, representing primary microplastic sources. Conventional drinking water treatment plants achieved 85-95% removal efficiency for particles >50 μm but declined to 40-60% for smaller fractions, with analytical limitations persisting below 5 μm. Emerging technologies including photocatalytic degradation demonstrated up to 70% polypropylene removal, though scalability challenges include high energy requirements (2-5 kWh/m³) and potential toxic intermediate formation. Health implications include endocrine disruption, inflammatory responses, and oxidative stress, with nanoplastics (<1 μm) potentially 10-100 times more prevalent than microplastics, though detection capabilities remain critically limited. Legislative frameworks, including the EU Single-Use Plastics Directive, have shown measurable reductions (20-40%) in targeted polymer types, though enforcement gaps and limited scope continue hampering comprehensive pollution control. Standardised international monitoring protocols remain integral for effective contamination assessment.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Removal of microplastics and nanoplastics in water treatment processes: A systematic literature review
Researchers systematically reviewed 103 studies across 26 water treatment plants in 12 countries to assess how well various technologies remove microplastics and nanoplastics from drinking water, finding that while coagulation, filtration, and advanced treatments help, significant gaps remain. The review identifies that no single process achieves complete removal, leaving microplastics as a persistent contaminant in treated water supplies.
Occurrence, Fate, and Treatment of Micro/Nano Plastics in Drinking Water Sources
This review examines the occurrence, fate, and treatment of micro- and nanoplastics in drinking water sources, covering how these particles enter water supplies and what treatment technologies exist to remove them. The authors note significant gaps in both detection methods and removal efficiency.
Nano/microplastics in water and wastewater treatment processes – Origin, impact and potential solutions
This review examined the origin, fate, and impacts of nano- and microplastics in water and wastewater treatment processes, finding that small particle sizes and diverse polymer compositions make complete removal challenging across conventional and advanced treatment stages. The authors identify detection limitations and process instability as key barriers to effective water treatment for nanoplastics.
Occurrence of microplastics in raw and treated drinking water
Researchers analyzed raw and treated water from three water treatment plants and found microplastics in all samples, though treatment reduced particle counts by roughly 70 to 80 percent. The vast majority of detected particles were smaller than 10 micrometers, a size range often missed by other studies. The findings highlight that while water treatment removes most microplastics, very small particles can still pass through conventional filtration systems.
Microplastics in Water: Occurrence, Human Health Impact and Methods of Analysis
This review covers the occurrence of microplastics in water sources globally, summarizing human health impacts from ingestion and inhalation, and evaluating available treatment technologies for removing microplastics from drinking water. The authors conclude that conventional water treatment is insufficient for complete microplastic removal.