0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Decomposition rate and biochemical fate of carbon from natural polymers and microplastics in boreal lakes

Frontiers in Microbiology 2022 14 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Jussi S. Vesamäki, Riitta Nissinen, Martin J. Kainz, Matthias Pilecky, Marja Tiirola, Sami J. Taipale

Summary

Researchers investigated the microbial decomposition rates and biochemical fate of several natural polymers (lignin, cellulose, hemicellulose) and microplastics as carbon sources in boreal freshwater lakes, finding that natural recalcitrant polymers and synthetic microplastics differ substantially in their rates of microbial mineralisation and incorporation into aquatic food webs.

Microbial mineralization of organic compounds is essential for carbon recycling in food webs. Microbes can decompose terrestrial recalcitrant and semi-recalcitrant polymers such as lignin and cellulose, which are precursors for humus formation. In addition to naturally occurring recalcitrant substrates, microplastics have been found in various aquatic environments. However, microbial utilization of lignin, hemicellulose, and microplastics as carbon sources in freshwaters and their biochemical fate and mineralization rate in freshwaters is poorly understood. To fill this knowledge gap, we investigated the biochemical fate and mineralization rates of several natural and synthetic polymer-derived carbon in clear and humic lake waters. We used stable isotope analysis to unravel the decomposition processes of different 13 C-labeled substrates [polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, lignin/hemicellulose, and leaves ( Fagus sylvatica )]. We also used compound-specific isotope analysis and molecular biology to identify microbes associated with used substrates. Leaves and hemicellulose were rapidly decomposed compared to microplastics which were degraded slowly or below detection level. Furthermore, aromatic polystyrene was decomposed faster than aliphatic polyethylene and polypropylene. The major biochemical fate of decomposed substrate carbon was in microbial biomass. Bacteria were the main decomposers of all studied substrates, whereas fungal contribution was poor. Bacteria from the family Burkholderiaceae were identified as potential leaf and polystyrene decomposers, whereas polypropylene and polyethylene were not decomposed.

Share this paper