We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
An investigation into the mechanistic impacts of conventional and alternative plastics on plant growth and carbon dynamics.
Summary
Researchers compared the effects of conventional polymers (polyethylene, polypropylene) and biodegradable alternatives (polyhydroxyalkanoate, polylactic acid) as microplastic films on ryegrass growth and soil health indicators. Most polymer treatments significantly reduced root biomass, chlorophyll content, and soil organic matter while increasing respiration rate, with biodegradable plastics sometimes causing greater decreases in organic matter, suggesting they carry comparable ecological risks.
Despite their increasing application as mulching films, knowledge on the ecological risks of biodegradable plastics is limited: preliminary research shows they may have equal impacts to conventional polymers, but there exists a strong research focus on the effects of fibrous microplastics, with films neglected. Many unknowns in the underlying mechanisms of microplastic effects exist; information on polymer additives is rare, with little research on the effects of aged microplastics within soil ecosystems. This project researches the effects of conventional versus alternative polymers on plant performance indicators, as measured by shoot and root biomass and chlorophyll content, and soil health indicators, as measured by organic matter content, soil respiration and pH. Polyethylene, polypropylene, polyhydroxyalkanoate and polylactic acid films were added to soil and rye grass was grown. It is hypothesised that the biodegradable polymers will be as negatively impacting as the conventional polymers on plant and soil performance and health indicators. The initial experiments found the majority of polymer treatments to significantly reduce root biomass, chlorophyll a and b content, organic matter content and pH, significantly increasing respiration rate, relative to controls. In some cases, the biodegradable plastics were found to experience a greater decrease in organic matter content and a greater increase in respiration rate. The mechanisms behind the decrease in soil organic matter, a proportion of which will be organic carbon, as well as the increased soil respiration rate CO2 flux from the soils to the atmosphere will be an important pathway to explore. Additional research will expand these ideas by experimenting with aged microplastic films, as opposed to the new films used in the described study. Furthermore, plastic leachate will be added to soils to test the chemical effects of microplastic pollution, contrasting the physical effects being tested, as described here. Also see: https://micro2022.sciencesconf.org/425670/document
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Impacts of pristine, aged and leachate of conventional and biodegradable plastics on plant growth and soil organic carbon
Researchers compared the effects of conventional plastics (polyethylene, polypropylene) and biodegradable alternatives (polyhydroxybutyrate, polylactic acid) on ryegrass growth and soil health in both pristine and aged forms. They found that all plastic types, whether conventional or biodegradable, reduced plant biomass, lowered soil pH and organic matter, and increased CO2 respiration rates. The study provides evidence that biodegradable plastics are not necessarily safer for soil ecosystems than conventional plastics.
Comparing the impact of microplastics derived from a biodegradable and a conventional plastic mulch on plant performance
Researchers directly compared how microplastics from biodegradable and conventional plastic mulch films affect plant growth and found that biodegradable plastic particles actually reduced plant biomass more than conventional plastic particles in some cases. This challenges the assumption that biodegradable plastics are always safer for agriculture, since their breakdown products may still harm crops that end up in the human food supply.
Impacts of conventional and biodegradable microplastics in maize-soil ecosystems: Above and below ground
Researchers compared the effects of conventional plastics (polyethylene and polypropylene) and biodegradable plastics (PBAT and PCL) on corn plants and soil health. One biodegradable plastic, PCL, reduced plant production by about 74% and severely disrupted soil enzyme activity and microbial communities. This study cautions that simply replacing conventional plastics with biodegradable alternatives in farming is not guaranteed to be safer for soil ecosystems.
Soil biota modulate the effects of microplastics on biomass and diversity of plant communities
Researchers used mesocosm experiments with natural soil biota to compare the effects of biodegradable and non-biodegradable microplastics on plant community biomass and diversity. Soil biota modulated the impact of microplastics, with biodegradable plastics showing similar effects to conventional plastics on plant community structure, challenging the assumption that biodegradable alternatives are environmentally benign.
Microplastics in agroecosystem – effects of plastic mulch film residues on soil-plant system
This review examines how residues from both conventional polyethylene and biodegradable plastic mulch films accumulate in agricultural soils and affect plant growth and soil health. Both types of mulch film residues are found to have negative effects on the soil-plant system, raising questions about the environmental safety of biodegradable plastic alternatives.