0
Article Tier 2 Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Comparative toxicological effects of traditional and biodegradable microplastics on pepper (Capsicum annuum L.): physiological and metabolomic insights

Environmental Research 2025 1 citation

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared the toxicity of four traditional and two biodegradable microplastics on pepper plants over 60 days and found that all types inhibited growth, though through distinct mechanisms. Non-degradable polypropylene and polystyrene caused stronger growth inhibition, while biodegradable PBS microplastics triggered the most severe oxidative stress. Metabolomic analysis revealed that biodegradable and traditional microplastics each disrupt different metabolic pathways, challenging the notion that biodegradable plastics are inherently safer for agricultural ecosystems.

Microplastics (MPs), as emerging environmental contaminants, increasingly threaten plant performance in agricultural ecosystems, yet the differential toxicity of traditional and biodegradable MPs remains unclear. Here, we conducted a 60-day soil culture experiment to evaluate the effects of six MPs, four traditional polymers and two biodegradable plastics, on pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) at 0.1 % and 0.5 % (w/w). Growth inhibition occurred in a type- and dose-dependent manner, with non-degradable PP-MPs and PS-MPs exerting stronger effects than biodegradable MPs. PBS-MPs caused the most severe oxidative stress, increasing HO content by 205.4 %. Metabolomic analyses revealed metabolic reprogramming under MPs exposure, with flux shifting from photosynthetic carbon assimilation/glycolysis to the pentose phosphate pathway. Notably, PVC-MPs imposed stronger inhibition on carbon assimilation/glycolysis. Metabolomic analysis further revealed that oxidative stress was closely associated with metabolic reprogramming: biodegradable MPs (PLA, PBS) markedly disrupted aromatic amino acid biosynthesis (e.g., tyramine decreased by 73.8 %), thereby weakening the basis for antioxidant defense, whereas traditional PS-MPs specifically suppressed downstream phenylpropanoid metabolism (e.g., 4-hydroxycinnamic acid and sinapic acid decreased). Collectively, these findings demonstrate that biodegradable and traditional MPs induce phytotoxicity through distinct mechanisms: biodegradable MPs primarily trigger oxidative damage and perturb primary metabolism, whereas traditional MPs preferentially suppress energy metabolism and secondary defense pathways. This study provides mechanistic insights into MPs-induced stress responses in pepper and highlights potential risks of both traditional and biodegradable MPs to agroecosystem health.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

The multifaceted mechanisms of microplastic inhibition of tomato plant growth: oxidative toxicity, metabolic perturbation, and photosynthetic damage

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed tomato seedlings to biodegradable and conventional microplastics and investigated photosynthetic performance, metabolic disruption, and oxidative stress responses. Both microplastic types inhibited tomato growth and caused oxidative damage, with impacts on the photosynthetic apparatus and metabolite profiles, challenging the assumption that biodegradable plastics are safer for agricultural systems.

Article Tier 2

Biodegradable microplastics trigger agroecosystem trade-offs: Microbial-driven disruption of photosynthesis, carbon fixation, and nitrogen cycling

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers used multi-omics analysis to compare biodegradable microplastics (PBAT, PBS, PLA) against conventional polyethylene in sandy soil over 64 days, finding that biodegradable variants caused greater harm — including 28–74% reductions in tomato photosynthesis, elevated CO2 emissions, and disrupted nitrogen cycling — challenging the assumption that biodegradability equals environmental safety.

Article Tier 2

Comparing the impact of microplastics derived from a biodegradable and a conventional plastic mulch on plant performance

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers directly compared how microplastics from biodegradable and conventional plastic mulch films affect plant growth and found that biodegradable plastic particles actually reduced plant biomass more than conventional plastic particles in some cases. This challenges the assumption that biodegradable plastics are always safer for agriculture, since their breakdown products may still harm crops that end up in the human food supply.

Article Tier 2

Polyethylene Terephthalate Microplastics Induce More Pronounced Physiological and Molecular Responses in Pepper Plants than Polyethylene: Insights from Physiological, Transcriptomic, and Metabolomic Perspectives

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists found that two common plastic types, PE and PET, harm pepper plants by stunting growth and disrupting their natural defense chemicals, with PET (used in bottles and food packaging) causing more damage than PE. Since these plastics are accumulating in farm soils, this raises concerns about crop health and food quality, though more research is needed to understand direct effects on human health.

Article Tier 2

Effects of polyethylene and biodegradable microplastics on the physiology and metabolic profiles of dandelion

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared how conventional polyethylene and two "biodegradable" plastic alternatives affected dandelion plants when mixed into soil. All three types of microplastics stunted plant growth and caused oxidative stress, with conventional polyethylene being the most toxic -- showing that even so-called biodegradable plastics can harm plant health and soil ecosystems.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper