We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Dual-method analysis of microplastics in lake and wastewater treatment effluents: comparison of micro-FTIR and differential scanning calorimetry technique
Summary
Researchers compared micro-FTIR and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) for detecting microplastics in lake water and wastewater treatment effluents, finding that both methods showed similar pollution trends but differed in specific results, with micro-FTIR identifying polymer types and DSC providing superior mass quantification from large-volume samples.
• FTIR and DSC show similar MPs pollution trends, but their specific results differ. • Total MPs concentrations ranges 0.38 - 4.0 no./L (μFTIR) and 0.38 - 5.34 μg/L (DSC). • μFTIR detect various polymer types and size, but mass estimation lead overestimation. • DSC offers superior quantification of MPs mass with treated large volume (500–1000 L). • Dual analysis enabled balanced representation of MPs pollution in water environment. Microplastics (MPs) pollution presents a significant analytical challenge in aquatic environments. This study compares two analytical techniques for MPs detection, spectroscopic analysis using micro-Fourier transform infrared (μFTIR) spectroscopy and thermal analysis using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), to comprehensively assess MPs. Samples were collected in March and October 2024 from Uiam Lake and effluents discharged by two wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in Chuncheon, South Korea. In both sampling periods, MPs concentrations ranged from 0.38 to 4.0 no./L (μFTIR) and 0.38 to 5.34 μg/L (DSC). The detected MPs varied in size (17–5000 μm), color, and were mostly fragmented. The highest concentration and largest MPs were observed at the most downstream site of Uiam Lake, indicating MPs accumulation primarily through nonpoint sources and significant influence from anthropogenic contamination. Using both μFTIR and DSC analyses, PMMA, PET, and PS MPs were commonly detected in Uiam Lake and effluents from both WWTPs consistently contained PMMA, PET, PS, and PE MPs. However, certain polymers were detected by only one of the methods. This discrepancy caused by differences in sample volumes, 500–1000 L for DSC and 5–10 L for μFTIR analysis, as well as the limited range of polymers that can be analyzed by DSC. Therefore, while μFTIR is more effective for identifying a broad range of polymer types, DSC offers superior quantification of MPs mass. A dual analytical strategy thus provides a balanced representation of both particle- and mass-based data, which is essential for accurate environmental assessment and source attribution of MPs pollution.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
A facile approach to microplastic identification and quantification using differential scanning calorimetry
Researchers developed a simpler differential scanning calorimetry method to identify and quantify six types of semi-crystalline microplastic polymers in water samples, offering a lower-cost alternative to μFTIR that also provides mass concentration data.
Not one-size-fits-all: µ-FTIR and pyrolysis GC-MS for complementary analysis of microplastics in eutrophic surface water.
Researchers applied a combined stereomicroscopy, micro-FTIR, and pyrolysis GC-MS workflow to surface water samples from Lake Victoria, finding polyethylene and polypropylene as dominant polymers by particle count while pyrolysis GC-MS quantified seven additional polymers — including nylons and PET — largely invisible to FTIR, demonstrating the complementary value of both techniques.
Sequential combination of micro-FTIR imaging spectroscopy and pyrolysis-GC/MS for microplastic quantification. Application to river sediments
Researchers developed a protocol combining micro-FTIR imaging and pyrolysis-GC/MS for sequential microplastic analysis in river sediments. While both methods showed consistent total mass concentrations across sites, they found discrepancies in polymer proportions due to each method's specific limitations, providing practical recommendations for comparing results across different analytical approaches.
Comparison of μ-ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and py-GCMS as identification tools for microplastic particles and fibers isolated from river sediments
Researchers compared two identification methods — micro-ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and pyrolysis-GC-MS — for characterizing microplastics extracted from river sediments, finding that the methods generally agreed on dominant polymers but differed in sensitivity to certain types. The comparison provides practical guidance for choosing analytical methods in freshwater microplastic monitoring programs.
Sequential quantification of number and mass of microplastics in municipal wastewater using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and pyrolysis gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
Researchers developed a sequential analytical method combining FTIR microscopy and pyrolysis-GC/MS to identify and quantify microplastics in municipal wastewater samples, with FTIR providing polymer type and physical dimensions and Pyr-GC/MS providing chemical composition. The combined approach improves accuracy compared to using either method alone.