0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Nanoplastic-Induced Biological Effects In Vivo and In Vitro: An Overview

Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 2023 21 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Hongxin Xie, Tian Xue, Xiaoying Lin, Rui Chen, S. F. Hameed, Liming Wang, Yong‐Liang Yu, Yuanyuan Li, Yufeng Li

Summary

Researchers reviewed how nanoplastics accumulate in and harm living organisms, finding that particle size, surface charge, exposure dose, and duration all influence toxicity — with smaller, charged particles penetrating cells more readily and chemical additives amplifying harm beyond the plastics themselves.

Body Systems
Study Type In vivo

Nanoplastics (NPs) are emerging pollutants with great concern due to their small size and potential adverse effects on living organisms. This review summarizes the biological effects of NPs in vivo (plants and animals) and in vitro (cells). NPs can be ingested and accumulated in organisms and transferred along the food chain, affecting the growth, development, and reproduction at each trophic level. Several factors including surface charges, size, exposure dose, and exposure time affect the biological effects of NPs. Surface-charged NPs have a more significant impact on the normal physiological activities of cells, while smaller particles facilitate the penetration across the cell membranes. Higher doses and longer exposure time contribute to the higher accumulation. In addition, additives and environmental pollutants attached to NPs pose a greater threat to organisms than NPs themselves. There are still several analytical challenges in the study of the biological effects of NPs, especially their accumulation, degradation, migration and interactions with the biological systems. Further works on the risk assessment of NPs derived from commonly used plastics in our daily life like polyethylene terephthalate (PET) rather than laboratory-made polystyrene (PS) beads are still highly desired.

Share this paper