0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Gut & Microbiome Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Microplastic in Freshwater Environment: A Review on Techniques and Abundance for Microplastic Detection in Lake Water

Trends in Sciences 2023 9 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Rajeshwori Malla-Pradhan, Rajeshwori Malla-Pradhan, Rajeshwori Malla-Pradhan, Rajeshwori Malla-Pradhan, Rajeshwori Malla-Pradhan, Rajeshwori Malla-Pradhan, Bijay Lal Pradhan, Khamphe Phoungthong Bijay Lal Pradhan, Bijay Lal Pradhan, Khamphe Phoungthong Khamphe Phoungthong Khamphe Phoungthong Khamphe Phoungthong Khamphe Phoungthong Tista Prasai Joshi, Tista Prasai Joshi, Tista Prasai Joshi, Tista Prasai Joshi, Tista Prasai Joshi, Bijay Lal Pradhan, Bijay Lal Pradhan, Bijay Lal Pradhan, Tista Prasai Joshi, Khamphe Phoungthong

Summary

This review examines microplastic pollution in freshwater environments, summarizing detection techniques and reporting on abundance data from rivers, lakes, and streams worldwide. The authors highlight methodological inconsistencies that complicate cross-study comparisons and call for standardized sampling and analysis protocols.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

Microplastic particles have been detected in water sources such as in oceans, lakes and rivers worldwide, which have received much attention in recent years. This review includes a summary of the analytical techniques such as sampling, processing and identification used by researchers to evaluate microplastic in lake water from 35 studies. Microplastic abundance and its morphological characteristics were also compared. Bulk sampling and volume-reduced sampling were almost equally implemented during sample collection. During sample processing, digestion were followed by 85.71 % of the researcher’s using hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to degrade the organic matter present in the sample. Though density separation is the most common approach to extract microplastic from sediment sample, this was not the case in lake water as only 31.43 % used this method. Fibers were the most dominant shape and the maximum abundance of microplastics were found to be in < 0.5 and < 2 mm2 size class. Most studies reported microplastic to be of polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP). HIGHLIGHTS Digestion is an important step during sample processing In lake water density separation is less frequently used method Fibers dominated in the size class < 0.5 and < 2 mm Microplastic in lake water is commonly expressed in volume unit GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper