0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Characterisation of microplastics is key for reliable data interpretation

Chemosphere 2023 59 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Diana S. Moura, Diana S. Moura, Carlos J. Pestana, Diana S. Moura, Diana S. Moura, Diana S. Moura, Carlos J. Pestana, Carlos J. Pestana, Diana S. Moura, Linda A. Lawton Diana S. Moura, Carlos J. Pestana, Carlos J. Pestana, Carlos J. Pestana, Colin F. Moffat, Colin F. Moffat, Colin F. Moffat, Colin F. Moffat, Linda A. Lawton Colin F. Moffat, Colin F. Moffat, Colin F. Moffat, Colin F. Moffat, Colin F. Moffat, Colin F. Moffat, Jianing Hui, Jianing Hui, Jianing Hui, Linda A. Lawton Linda A. Lawton Jianing Hui, Jianing Hui, John T. S. Irvine, John T. S. Irvine, John T. S. Irvine, Linda A. Lawton John T. S. Irvine, John T. S. Irvine, Linda A. Lawton Linda A. Lawton Linda A. Lawton Linda A. Lawton Linda A. Lawton

Summary

Researchers evaluated 21 published adsorption studies and found that most used microplastics with superficial or no physicochemical characterization, arguing that thorough characterization is essential for reliable and reproducible microplastic research data.

Microplastic research has gained attention due to the increased detection of microplastics (<5 mm size) in the aquatic environment. Most laboratory-based research of microplastics is performed using microparticles from specific suppliers with either superficial or no characterisation performed to confirm the physico-chemical information detailed by the supplier. The current study has selected 21 published adsorption studies to evaluate how the microplastics were characterised by the authors prior experimentation. Additionally, six microplastic types described as 'small' (10-25 μm) and 'large' (100 μm) were commercially acquired from a single supplier. A detailed characterisation was performed using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), x-ray diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry, scanning electron microscopy, particle size analysis, and N-Brunauer, Emmett and Teller adsorption-desorption surface area analysis. The size and the polymer composition of some of the material provided by the supplier was inconsistent with the analytical data obtained. FT-IR spectra of small polypropylene particles indicated either oxidation of the particles or the presence of a grafting agent which was absent in the large particles. A wide range of sizes for the small particles was observed: polyethylene (0.2-549 μm), polyethylene terephthalate (7-91 μm) and polystyrene (1-79 μm). Small polyamide (D 75 μm) showed a greater median particle size and similar size distribution when compared to large polyamide (D 65 μm). Moreover, small polyamide was found to be semi-crystalline, while the large polyamide displayed an amorphous form. The type of microplastic and the size of the particles are a key factor in determining the adsorption of pollutants and subsequent ingestion by aquatic organisms. Acquiring uniform particle sizes is challenging, however based on this study, characterisation of any materials used in microplastic-related experiments is critical to ensure reliable interpretation of results, thereby providing a better understanding of the potential environmental consequences of the presence of microplastics in aquatic ecosystems.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper