0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Environmental stress and nanoplastics’ effects on Ciona robusta: regulation of immune/stress-related genes and induction of innate memory in pharynx and gut

Frontiers in Immunology 2023 12 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Diana Boraschi, Diana Boraschi, Diana Boraschi, Rita Marino, Daniela Melillo, Daniela Melillo, Daniela Melillo, Daniela Melillo, Paola Italiani Diana Boraschi, Diana Boraschi, Paola Italiani Rita Marino, Rita Marino, Daniela Melillo, Daniela Melillo, Paola Italiani Diana Boraschi, Paola Italiani Paola Italiani Diana Boraschi, Diana Boraschi, Paola Italiani Diana Boraschi, Diana Boraschi, Paola Italiani

Summary

Researchers found that nanoplastics combined with environmental stressors triggered immune and stress-related gene regulation changes in the marine organism Ciona robusta, along with apoptosis induction, suggesting synergistic harmful effects on marine invertebrates.

Polymers
Body Systems

In addition to circulating haemocytes, the immune system of the solitary ascidian <i>Ciona robusta</i> relies on two organs, the pharynx and the gut, and encompasses a wide array of immune and stress-related genes. How the pharynx and the gut of <i>C. robusta</i> react and adapt to environmental stress was assessed upon short or long exposure to hypoxia/starvation in the absence or in the presence of polystyrene nanoplastics. We show that the immune response to stress is very different between the two organs, suggesting an organ-specific immune adaptation to the environmental changes. Notably, the presence of nanoplastics appears to alter the gene modulation induced by hypoxia/starvation in both organs, resulting in a partial increase in gene up-regulation in the pharynx and a less evident response to stress in the gut. We have also assessed whether the hypoxia/starvation stress could induce innate memory, measured as gene expression in response to a subsequent challenge with the bacterial agent LPS. Exposure to stress one week before challenge induced a substantial change in the response to LPS, with a general decrease of gene expression in the pharynx and a strong increase in the gut. Co-exposure with nanoplastics only partially modulated the stress-induced memory response to LPS, without substantially changing the stress-dependent gene expression profile in either organ. Overall, the presence of nanoplastics in the marine environment seems able to decrease the immune response of <i>C. robusta</i> to stressful conditions, hypothetically implying a reduced capacity to adapt to environmental changes, but only partially affects the stress-dependent induction of innate memory and subsequent responses to infectious challenges.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper