0
Article Tier 2 Detection Methods Gut & Microbiome Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Microplastic contamination in fish: Critical review and assessment of data quality

Food Control 2023 34 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

This critical review assessed the data quality of 104 published studies on microplastic ingestion by fish, finding that inconsistent methods for sampling, extraction, and identification have produced questionable results and highlighting the need for standardized quality assurance protocols.

Polymers

Although the ingestion of microplastics by fish has been investigated extensively over the last 50 years, the quality of these ingestion studies is questionable due to the lack of standard methods for sampling, extraction, and identification of microplastics. This review aims to provide reliable results of microplastic occurrence in fish sourced from 104 published articles through a rigorous assessment of the data quality. A scoring system was performed to assess ten quality assurance/quality control criteria including sampling methods, sample size, sample processing and storage, laboratory preparation, clean air conditions, negative controls, positive controls, target component, sample treatment and polymer identification. We found that 59 out of 104 articles had scores ≤10, and only two studies are identified with scores higher than 15, demonstrating the urgent need to improve the quality and reliability of fish digestion studies. Particularly, five criteria, namely, the positive controls, sampling method, clean air conditions, sample size, and polymer identification with an average score of less than 1 need attention and improvement in future studies. This review also revealed that the 104 studies considered here originated mainly from five countries, i.e., China (23%), Iran (8%), Thailand (5%), Turkey (4%), and Indonesia (4%). Among 104 studies, the major polymer type found was polyethylene, with a size range of 0–1 mm. The most frequently reported colour and shape of microplastics found in the fish were blue and fibre, respectively.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Quality Criteria for the Analysis of Microplastic in Biota Samples: A Critical Review

AI summary Read the abstract

Ten quality criteria were applied to review recent microplastic ingestion studies in aquatic biota, finding wide variation in methodological rigor including inadequate sample sizes, poor contamination controls, and inconsistent polymer identification methods. The authors propose a standardized quality assessment framework to improve comparability of microplastic ingestion data across studies.

Systematic Review Tier 1

Microplastic biomonitoring studies in aquatic species: A review & quality assessment framework

AI summary Read the abstract

This systematic review evaluates the quality of studies that monitor microplastic contamination in marine organisms like fish and shellfish. The researchers found that only 8% of studies met rigorous quality standards, highlighting the need for better research methods so we can accurately understand how much microplastic exposure comes from eating seafood.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in freshwaters and drinking water: Critical review and assessment of data quality

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers critically reviewed fifty studies on microplastics in freshwater and drinking water and found significant quality issues, including inconsistent sampling methods and inadequate contamination controls. Many studies lacked proper quality assurance, making it difficult to draw reliable conclusions about actual contamination levels. The study emphasizes that standardized methods are urgently needed before the true extent of microplastic contamination in drinking water can be assessed.

Article Tier 2

Sampling, Isolating and Identifying Microplastics Ingested by Fish and Invertebrates *

AI summary Read the abstract

This methodological review critically evaluated sampling, isolation, and identification techniques for microplastics ingested by fish and invertebrates, identifying common sources of error including contamination during processing, particle loss, and misidentification — and recommending standardized protocols.

Article Tier 2

A critical review of microplastics characterisation in aquatic environments: recent trends in the last 10 years

AI summary Read the abstract

This critical review assessed current approaches to characterizing microplastics in aquatic environments, evaluating sampling methods, extraction protocols, and analytical techniques. It identified persistent inconsistencies in methodology and recommended standardization practices to improve data comparability.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper