We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Understanding the variability in rotational traction testing on artificial turf
Summary
Researchers investigated sources of variability in rotational traction measurements on artificial turf surfaces, comparing a statically loaded tester and a lightweight operator-loaded tester to distinguish turf-related inconsistencies from operator-induced variability. The study identified contributions of both turf heterogeneity and manual operation technique to overall variability in peak torque measurements used by sporting governing bodies.
Abstract Rotational traction is a key parameter used by sporting governing bodies to determine the safety and performance of artificial turf surfaces. Currently, the Federation Internationale de Football uses two devices for measuring rotational traction: a statically loaded rotational traction tester and a lightweight rotational traction tester, loaded by the operator. Variability in measurements emanates from two main sources: inconsistencies in the turf and the manual operation of both testers. The purpose of this study was to investigate the contributions from the turf and the manual operation of the testers to the total variability in peak torque measurements, achieved by comparing results from both manually operated rotational traction testers with an automated rotational traction tester. Five experienced operators used the manual testers to conduct 15 rotational traction tests on four different artificial turf surfaces. The automated tester measured rotational traction on each surface 15 times. The results revealed the turf system contributed over 50% of the total variability for both manually operated testers, on all four surfaces. The lightweight tester produced greater between (inter)-operator variability, but lower within (intra)-operator variability compared to the standard rotational traction tester. Operator height appeared to influence results for the lightweight tester, but not for the standard tester. The results support the continued use of manual rotational traction testers for commercial compliance field testing of artificial turf surfaces; however, they indicate the need to further explore the effects of manual operation on both devices.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
The effect of rotational velocity on rotational traction across a range of artificial turf surface systems
Researchers investigated how rotational velocity affects peak torque measurements during rotational traction testing of artificial turf surfaces, using an automated tester to examine nine velocities between 10 and 210 degrees per second across multiple surface systems. The study found that rotational velocity significantly influences traction readings, raising questions about the comparability of results between the standard rotational traction tester (72 deg/s) and the lightweight tester (30 deg/s) used by sporting governing bodies.
A comparison of two rotational traction test devices for artificial turf
Despite its title referencing microplastic infills, this paper studies sports pitch traction testing — not microplastic pollution. It examines the mechanical performance of two rotational traction test devices when used on artificial turf pitches infilled with natural alternatives (cork, olive pits, wood) that have replaced banned microplastic rubber crumb, and is not primarily relevant to microplastics or human health.
Investigating normal stress effects on the shear and traction characteristics of performance infill materials used in artificial turf surfaces
Researchers investigated how normal stress affects rotational traction for three artificial turf infill materials—styrene butadiene rubber, cork, and pine—across five normal stress levels. All materials showed distinct stress-traction relationships, providing data to support safer turf surface design and informing the transition away from rubber crumb infill, which contributes microplastics to the environment.
Comparison of Methods for Sampling Particulate Emissions from Tires under Different Test Environments
Researchers compared different methods for sampling tire wear particle emissions under various test conditions, finding significant methodological differences that affect measurement outcomes and highlighting the need for standardized approaches as non-exhaust emissions become an increasing share of total vehicle pollution.
Tyre granulate on the loose; How much escapes the turf? A systematic literature review
Without mitigation measures, an average artificial football turf loses approximately 950 kg/year of tire rubber infill to the environment, with snow removal adding up to 830 kg/year more. The most effective reduction strategies target snow clearing, mechanical brushing, and granulate carried off by players.