0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Policy & Risk Sign in to save

The effect of rotational velocity on rotational traction across a range of artificial turf surface systems

Scientific Reports 2023 5 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Harry McGowan, Paul Fleming, Jae-Hwi Pak, David James, Steph Forrester

Summary

Researchers investigated how rotational velocity affects peak torque measurements during rotational traction testing of artificial turf surfaces, using an automated tester to examine nine velocities between 10 and 210 degrees per second across multiple surface systems. The study found that rotational velocity significantly influences traction readings, raising questions about the comparability of results between the standard rotational traction tester (72 deg/s) and the lightweight tester (30 deg/s) used by sporting governing bodies.

Mechanical testing by sporting governing bodies ensures artificial turf surfaces conform with performance standards. Rotational traction is measured using two equivalent devices: a rotational traction tester (RTT) and a lightweight rotational traction tester (LRTT). The devices differ in target rotational velocity; 72 deg/s for the RTT and 30 deg/s for the LRTT. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of rotational velocity on peak torque during rotational traction testing. An automated rotational traction tester examined nine rotational velocities between 10 and 210 deg/s, and ten artificial turf surface systems with a range of performance infill materials, infill depths and carpet specifications. Rotations at 10 deg/s produced the lowest peak torques on nine of the ten surfaces. Infill materials with intrinsic viscoelastic properties produced significantly higher peak torques at higher rotational velocities, whereas less elastic infill materials saw no significant increase in peak torque. A mean difference in peak torque of 2.6 Nm was found between the target velocities of the RTT and LRTT. The results support the synchronisation of target velocities for the RTT and LRTT. During standards testing, trials completed below a particular velocity should be repeated to negate velocity effects on peak torque.

Share this paper