We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Investigating normal stress effects on the shear and traction characteristics of performance infill materials used in artificial turf surfaces
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers investigated how normal stress affects rotational traction for three artificial turf infill materials—styrene butadiene rubber, cork, and pine—across five normal stress levels. All materials showed distinct stress-traction relationships, providing data to support safer turf surface design and informing the transition away from rubber crumb infill, which contributes microplastics to the environment.
Abstract Styrene butadiene rubber crumb is currently the most widely used performance infill material for artificial turf surfaces globally. Concerns about the impact of microplastics on the environment and human health has led to organic performance infill materials becoming more popular. Research surrounding these new performance infill materials is lacking; one key gap in knowledge is the relationship between normal stress and rotational traction. The purpose of this study was to analyse the relationship between normal stress and rotational traction for three performance infill materials: styrene butadiene rubber, cork and pine. Five normal stresses (10–46 kPa) were analysed during rotational traction testing on three artificial surface systems. Each performance infill material showed a positive, linear relationship between normal stress and mean peak torque, initial stiffness and secondary stiffness. However, the rate at which mean peak torque increased with normal stress varied between infilled systems. Pine infill increased at 1.55 Nm/kPa, cork at 1.51 Nm/kPa and styrene butadiene rubber at 1.16 Nm/kPa. Direct shear testing of each performance infill material was conducted at three normal stresses (25, 50 and 250 kPa) to investigate each performance infill materials relative resistance to shearing. The order of infill materials remained the same for both rotational traction and direct shear testing, with pine consistently producing the highest internal friction angle and styrene butadiene rubber the lowest. The results confirm the need to better understand the performance characteristics of organic infill materials used in artificial turf surfaces to maintain their safety and performance characteristics.
More Papers Like This
A comparison of two rotational traction test devices for artificial turf
AI summary Read the abstract
Despite its title referencing microplastic infills, this paper studies sports pitch traction testing — not microplastic pollution. It examines the mechanical performance of two rotational traction test devices when used on artificial turf pitches infilled with natural alternatives (cork, olive pits, wood) that have replaced banned microplastic rubber crumb, and is not primarily relevant to microplastics or human health.
Fate of recycled tyre granulate used on artificial turf
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers reviewed the environmental fate of recycled tyre rubber granulate used as infill on artificial turf fields, finding that while the material provides significant CO2 savings compared to alternatives, dispersal of approximately 3,000-5,000 kg per field per year to surrounding environments raises microplastic pollution concerns.
Artificial sport surfaces and adverse effects for human health. A literature review
AI summary Read the abstract
This literature review evaluates health risks from artificial sport surfaces using recycled tire rubber infill, finding that the EU classifies rubber granules as microplastics and that their hazardous chemical content raises bio-accessibility concerns especially for children using playgrounds.
A microplastic used as infill material in artificial sport turfs reduces plant growth
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers found that rubber crumb microplastics used as infill in artificial sport turfs reduced plant growth, highlighting that plastic pollution in terrestrial ecosystems may pose risks to vegetation that are currently poorly understood.
Jämförelse av alternativa fyllnadsmaterial till konstgräsplaner
AI summary Read the abstract
This study evaluated and compared multiple alternative infill materials for artificial football pitches to address the environmental impact of rubber infill, which has been identified as Sweden's second largest source of microplastic emissions. Analysis including GC-MS and XRF testing found that at least three alternatives (Envirofill, Safeshell, and Geofill) were more environmentally friendly, equal in play performance, and comparable in cost to EPDM rubber infill.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.