We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
[Occurrence and Characteristics of Macro/Micro-plastics and Phthalates in Soils Under Different Plastic Film Mulching].
Summary
Researchers assessed residual characteristics of macroplastics, microplastics, and phthalate plasticizers in agricultural soils under different plastic film mulching treatments over a three-year field experiment, comparing traditional PE film with three types of biodegradable mulch and a no-mulch control. The study examined whether biodegradable film substitution effectively reduces soil plastic and PAE residual pollution.
Biodegradable plastic film mulching （BFM） replacement is one of the effective approaches to alleviate the plastic residual pollution caused by long-term and extensive application of traditional mulching film in agriculture. However, information on their residual characteristics of plastic and PAEs in practical applications is limited. Here, we determined the residual characteristics of macroplastics and microplastics, as well as phthalates （PAEs）, in soils based on a three-year site-specific field experiment with five treatments including non-mulch film （CK）, traditional PE film （PE）, and three fully BFMs bought from the manufacturers, namely BS, HB, and SH, respectively. The results showed that the amount of macroplastics （>5 mm） in the soil ranged from （3.24±2.77） to （67.93 ±11.65） kg·hm-2, with the order of PE>BS>HB>SH. The dominant colors of macroplastics were transparent in CK, silver-black in PE, and black in the three biodegradable film mulch treatments. The abundance of microplastics in the soils ranged between （4 950±219） and （9 152±563） particles·kg-1, with an increase of 29.78%, 84.89%, 52.89%, and 51.11% for PE, BS, HB, and SH treatments compared to that in CK, respectively. The dominant shapes of microplastics were sheets and particles, and the colors were mainly transparent and black. Plastic film mulching reduced the proportion of sheet-shaped microplastics, while increasing the proportions of black microplastics and microplastics with sizes less than 20 and 20-100 μm, especially in the BMF-treated soils. Plastic film mulching also showed a non-significant increase in the total contents of five detectable priority controlled PAEs in the soil. The ecological risk grades of DBP were raised to a low and medium level by PE film mulching and BMF, respectively. Overall, our study demonstrated that plastic film is a major source of macroplastics and microplastics in soils, and continuous use of biodegradable plastic film can effectively reduce the residual amounts of macroplastics, while leading to more accumulation of microplastics with smaller particle size and increasing the ecological risks of DBP in soils.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Macro and microplastics in agricultural soils after use of conventional and biodegradable plastics
Researchers sampled 38 agricultural fields where conventional polyethylene mulching films, polypropylene weed fabrics, biodegradable PBAT films, and frost covers had been used, quantifying macro- and microplastic contamination in soils to assess how different agricultural plastic products contribute to soil plastic pollution.
Macro and microplastics in agricultural soils after use of conventional and biodegradable plastics
Researchers sampled 38 agricultural fields where different plastic products had been used — conventional polyethylene mulching films, polypropylene weed fabrics, biodegradable PBAT mulching films, frost covers, and oxo-degradable films — analyzing both macro and microplastics in soil at varying size fractions. They found plastic particles from all film types present in soils, with biodegradable and oxo-degradable films producing detectable microplastics, raising concerns about all agricultural plastic categories.
Thickness-dependent release of microplastics and phthalic acid esters from polythene and biodegradable residual films in agricultural soils and its related productivity effects
Researchers conducted a two-year study comparing the release of microplastics and phthalic acid esters from polyethylene and biodegradable mulch films of different thicknesses in agricultural soil. The study found that biodegradable films degraded significantly more than polyethylene films, with thinner films breaking down faster, and that microplastic release from residual films can affect soil properties and crop productivity.
From plastic mulching to microplastic pollution : An effect assessment of microplastics in the soil-plant system
This review assessed how plastic mulching films contribute to agricultural microplastic pollution, finding that biodegradable alternatives rarely fully degrade under field conditions and instead fragment into microplastics, with both LDPE and biodegradable microplastics producing measurable ecological effects in soil-plant systems.
Environmental fate and effects of mulch films on agricultural soil: A systematic review from application to residual impact
This systematic review examines how plastic mulch films used in agriculture break down over time and release microplastics into farm soil. The films improve crop growth but create lasting environmental damage as plastic fragments accumulate and alter soil properties. The findings underscore the importance of developing truly biodegradable alternatives to protect farmland from microplastic pollution.