0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Thickness-dependent release of microplastics and phthalic acid esters from polythene and biodegradable residual films in agricultural soils and its related productivity effects

Journal of Hazardous Materials 2023 76 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Ze‐Ying Zhao, Xiao‐Bin Xiong, Aimee Grace Uzamurera, Xiao‐Bin Xiong, Aimee Grace Uzamurera, Song Wang, Song Wang, Song Wang, Song Wang, Song Wang, Ze‐Ying Zhao, Ze‐Ying Zhao, Song Wang, Song Wang, Ze‐Ying Zhao, Peng-Yang Wang, Peng-Yang Wang, Peng-Yang Wang, Peng-Yang Wang, Ze‐Ying Zhao, Ze‐Ying Zhao, Ze‐Ying Zhao, Peng-Yang Wang, Peng-Yang Wang, Peng-Yang Wang, Peng-Yang Wang, Peng-Yang Wang, Peng-Yang Wang, Xiao‐Bin Xiong, Song Wang, Xiao‐Bin Xiong, Xiao‐Bin Xiong, Xiao‐Bin Xiong, Xiao‐Bin Xiong, Xiao‐Bin Xiong, Rui Zhou, Ze‐Ying Zhao, Ze‐Ying Zhao, Xiao‐Bin Xiong, Xiao‐Bin Xiong, Xiao‐Bin Xiong, Xiao‐Bin Xiong, Xiu-Ping Tao, Xiao‐Bin Xiong, Xiu-Ping Tao, Rui Zhou, Hong‐Yan Tao, Hong‐Yan Tao, Xiao‐Bin Xiong, Hong‐Yan Tao, Hong‐Yan Tao, Song Wang, Hong‐Yan Tao, Hong‐Yan Tao, Hong‐Yan Tao, Rui Zhou, Hong‐Yan Tao, Hong‐Yan Tao, Hong‐Yan Tao, Rui Zhou, Rui Zhou, Hong‐Yan Tao, Ze‐Ying Zhao, Wenying Wang, Hong‐Yan Tao, Wenying Wang, Wenying Wang, Peng-Yang Wang, Peng-Yang Wang, Xiao‐Bin Xiong, Xiao‐Bin Xiong, Wenying Wang, Hong‐Yan Tao, Song Wang, You‐Cai Xiong You‐Cai Xiong Hong‐Yan Tao, Song Wang, Kiprotich Wesly, Kiprotich Wesly, You‐Cai Xiong You‐Cai Xiong Hong‐Yan Tao, You‐Cai Xiong You‐Cai Xiong Hong‐Yan Tao, Aimee Grace Uzamurera, Aimee Grace Uzamurera, You‐Cai Xiong You‐Cai Xiong Song Wang, Xiu-Ping Tao, You‐Cai Xiong You‐Cai Xiong You‐Cai Xiong Hong‐Yan Tao, Hong‐Yan Tao, Xiu-Ping Tao, Wenying Wang, You‐Cai Xiong Wenying Wang, You‐Cai Xiong Hong‐Yan Tao, Hong‐Yan Tao, You‐Cai Xiong

Summary

Researchers conducted a two-year study comparing the release of microplastics and phthalic acid esters from polyethylene and biodegradable mulch films of different thicknesses in agricultural soil. The study found that biodegradable films degraded significantly more than polyethylene films, with thinner films breaking down faster, and that microplastic release from residual films can affect soil properties and crop productivity.

Polymers

It is crucial to elucidate the release rate of microplastics (MPs) and phthalic acid esters (PAEs) in agricultural soil and their effects on crop productivity regarding film types and thicknesses. To address this issue, two-year landfill test was performed using 0.016 mm-thick polyethylene (PEt1) & biodegradable (BIOt1), and 0.01 mm-thin polyethylene (PEt2) & biodegradable (BIOt2) residual films as materials with no landfill as CK. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and infrared analyses revealed that two-year landfill caused considerable changes in physical forms and spectral peaks in BIO film, which was more pronounced in thin BIO (36.90 % weight loss). Yet, less changes were presented in the above analyzes in polyethylene (PE) films, and thick films damaged relatively less. MPs number was 86,829.11 n/kg in BIOt1 and 134,912.27 n/kg in BIOt2, equivalent to 2.55 and 3.72 times higher than in PEt1 and PEt2, respectively. This was closely associated with PAEs release, as soil PAEs concentration was substantially lower in PEt1 (17.60 g/kg) and PEt2 (21.43 g/kg) than in BIOt1 and BIOt2 (37.12 g/kg and 49.20 g/kg), respectively. Furthermore, maize productivity parameters were negatively correlated with the amount of MPs and PAEs. BIOt2 and PEt1 had the lowest and highest grain yield, respectively. BIO exhibited greater environmental risk and adverse effects on soil and crop productivity than PE film due to physical degradation and release of PAEs. Thickness-wise comparison exhibited that thin film residues had more adverse effect relative to thick film ones.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper