We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comparative study on the toxic effects of secondary nanoplastics from biodegradable and conventional plastics on Streptomyces coelicolor M145
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared the toxic effects of nanoplastics released by biodegradable plastics versus conventional plastics on a soil bacterium. They found that biodegradable plastics like PLA and PHA actually released more nanoplastic particles than conventional polystyrene during a 30-day degradation period, and these particles caused greater harm to bacterial growth and metabolism. The study raises important questions about whether biodegradable plastics may pose unexpected short-term ecological risks in soil environments.
Because of the excellent properties, plastics have been widely used in the past decades and caused serious environmental issues. As an excellent substitute for conventional plastics, the biodegradable plastics have attracted increasing attention. However, biodegradable plastics may produce more micro/nanoplastics in the short time compared with conventional plastics, and cause more serious ecological risks. In this study, the short-term toxicity of nanoplastics released from biodegradable and conventional plastics on Streptomyces coelicolor M145 was investigated. After 30 days of degradation, the biodegradable microplastics, polylactic acid (PLA) and polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) released more secondary nanoplastics than conventional microplastics, polystyrene (PS). After exposure, PLA and PHA nanoplastics showed significant toxicity to M145. The survival rate of M145 cells was 16.1% after treatment with PLA nanoplastics for 7 days (PLA-7). The toxicity of PHA was lower than that of PLA. This might have been due to the agglomeration of PHA nanoplastics in the solution. Compared with the controls, the PS secondary nanoplastics showed no significant toxicity to M145. After the treatment, the production of antibiotics, actinorhodin (ACT) and undecylprodigiosin (RED), significantly increased. The yields of ACT and RED reached their maximum values after treatment with PLA-7, which were 4.2-fold and 2.1-fold higher than those of the controls, respectively. The addition of biodegradable nanoplastics significantly increased the expression of these key pathway-specific regulatory genes, leading to increased antibiotic production. This study provides toxicological insights into the impacts of conventional and biodegradable microplastics on S. coelicolor.
More Papers Like This
Differential responses of soil microbial community structure and function to conventional and biodegradable microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists compared how tiny pieces of regular plastics and "biodegradable" plastics affect helpful bacteria in soil after 6 months. They found that biodegradable plastics actually disrupted soil bacteria more than regular plastics, changing the microbes that help plants grow and cycle nutrients. This matters because these soil bacteria are crucial for growing healthy food, so switching to biodegradable plastics might not be the simple environmental solution we hoped for.
Insights into soil microbial assemblages and nitrogen cycling function responses to conventional and biodegradable microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared how biodegradable polylactic acid and conventional PVC microplastics affect soil bacteria and nitrogen cycling processes. They found that both types of microplastics altered microbial communities, but biodegradable plastics had distinct effects on nitrogen-processing bacteria and did not simply behave as a harmless alternative. The study suggests that switching to biodegradable plastics may change rather than eliminate the impact of microplastic contamination on soil health.
Environmental impacts of polylactic acid microplastics on terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems: more threatening compared to traditional microplastics?
AI summary Read the abstract
This review summarizes existing research on "biodegradable" PLA microplastics in soil and water environments. Studies found PLA microplastics can change soil nutrient cycling, microbial communities, and plant and animal health, sometimes differing from conventional plastics in these effects. The review notes long-term impacts remain unclear and calls for further comparative research.
[Effects of Microplastic Pollution on Microbial Activity and Carbon Metabolism Function in Soil].
AI summary Read the abstract
A laboratory experiment found that both conventional polystyrene and biodegradable polylactic acid microplastics significantly disrupt soil microbial communities, reducing enzyme activities and cutting soil carbon metabolism by up to 82% at high concentrations. Notably, biodegradable PLA caused more harm than conventional PS, likely because PLA degrades into dissolved organic matter and smaller particles that are more toxic to soil microbes. This challenges the assumption that biodegradable plastics are environmentally safe and highlights risks to nutrient cycling in contaminated soils.
Effects of polyethylene and polylactic acid microplastics on plant growth and bacterial community in the soil
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared the effects of regular polyethylene and biodegradable polylactic acid microplastics on soybean growth and soil bacteria. Surprisingly, the biodegradable microplastics caused more harm than conventional ones, significantly reducing root growth and altering soil bacterial communities important for nitrogen fixation. This finding challenges the assumption that biodegradable plastics are always safer for the environment and raises questions about their impact on food crops.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.