We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Occurrence and distribution of microplastics in long-term biosolid-applied rehabilitation land: An overlooked pathway for microplastic entry into terrestrial ecosystems in Australia
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers investigated microplastic abundance and composition in Australian mine rehabilitation land with long-term biosolid application histories, finding that biosolid-applied fields contained 7-86 times more microplastics than unamended control fields. Microplastic abundance increased with successive biosolid applications, identifying long-term biosolid land application as an overlooked pathway for microplastic entry into terrestrial ecosystems.
Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) efficiently eliminate over 98% of microplastics (MPs) from wastewater discharge, subsequently accumulating them in sludge. This sludge is frequently employed as fertilizer in agricultural practices or land rehabilitation. While there is significant research on biosolid application in agriculture, the discussion regarding its application in rehabilitating industrial zones and MPs contamination is limited. The current study investigates the abundance, distribution, and composition of MPs in rehabilitation land with long-term biosolid-application in Australia. Three minesite fields (designated 1-3), each with distinct biosolid application histories since 2011, 2012, and 2017, and a control field without any biosolid application history, were chosen for this study. The abundances of MPs in biosolid-applied fields 1-3 (6.04 ± 1.92 x 10 MP kg; 4.94 ± 0.73 x 10 MP kg; 2.48 ± 0.70 x 10 MP kg) were considerably higher compared to non-biosolid-applied field (0.70 ± 0.63 x 10 MP kg ). This indicates that the application of biosolids significantly contributes to the presence of MPs in the soil. Moreover, the results suggest that with each successive application, the abundance of MPs increases. The abundance and size of MPs in both biosolid and non-biosolid soils decreased as the soil depth increased. Microbeads were dominant in soils where biosolids were applied (up to 61.9%), while fibres were dominant in non-biosolid soils (accounting for 85.7%). The distribution of plastic polymer types varied among fields and soil depths. Most MPs were microbeads of polyamide (PA), fragments of polyethylene (PE), foam of polystyrene (PS), and fibres of rayon. This research presents evidence that the extended utilization of biosolids results in elevated MP pollution in minesite rehabilitation land, highlighting a frequently overlooked origin of MP contamination in terrestrial settings. Additional evaluations needed to understand ecological risks of MPs in soil ecosystems affected by biosolid application.
More Papers Like This
Comparing the microplastic content in biosolid-amended and non-amended agricultural soils
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared microplastic content in biosolid-amended agricultural soils versus non-amended control soils, examining eleven amended and nine non-amended sites to quantify the contribution of biosolid application to soil microplastic loads. The study found higher microplastic concentrations in biosolid-amended soils, confirming that biosolid application is a significant pathway for microplastic introduction into agricultural land.
Comprehensive assessment of microplastics in Australian biosolids: Abundance, seasonal variation and potential transport to agroecosystems
AI summary Read the abstract
This comprehensive study quantified microplastics in 146 biosolid samples from 13 Australian wastewater treatment plants across seasons, finding concentrations of 11 to 150 microplastics per gram dry weight with higher levels in cold, wet seasons. PET, polyurethane, and polymethyl methacrylate were the most abundant polymers, raising concerns about microplastic transport to agricultural soils through biosolid land application.
Accumulation of microplastics in soil after long-term application of biosolids and atmospheric deposition
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers measured microplastic levels in agricultural soils that had received biosolid fertilizer applications over 23 years and also tracked atmospheric deposition of microplastics over two years. They found that biosolid-amended soils had significantly more microplastics than control soils, with concentrations increasing with years of application. The study also revealed that airborne microplastic deposition, while smaller in volume, represents an additional and previously underappreciated source of plastic contamination in farmland.
Accumulation and fate of microplastics in soils after application of biosolids on land: A review
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers reviewing land application of biosolids found that agricultural soils receive between 18 and 690,000 microplastic particles per kilogram of soil, with retention increasing in soils rich in organic carbon and metal oxides, and that biodegradation alters plastic composition but proceeds slowly.
Transfer and transport of microplastics from biosolids to agricultural soils and the wider environment
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers measured microplastic concentrations in biosolids from two suppliers and in agricultural soils before and after biosolid application in Ontario, Canada, finding that biosolid application contributed 8,700–14,000 microplastic particles per kilogram of dry soil to agricultural fields.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.