0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Guidelines for measuring and reporting particle removal efficiency in fibrous media

Nature Communications 2023 9 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Paolo Maria Tronville, Vincenzo Gentile, Jesus Marval

Summary

This paper is not about microplastics in the primary research sense; it provides methodology guidelines for accurately measuring particle removal efficiency in fibrous filtration materials, recommending standardized aerosol science approaches for researchers developing new air filtration media.

Adopting standardized and reliable methodologies to accurately measure particle removal efficiency when developing fibrous materials for controlling airborne contamination is crucial. Here, we introduce well-established aerosol science and technology concepts often overlooked or misused in interdisciplinary studies developing new fibrous materials for particle filtration. We recommend best practices for experimental assessments and reporting to ensure a reliable evaluation of new airborne particle filtration media and technologies. Adopting standardized and reliable methodologies to accurately measure particle removal efficiency when developing fibrous materials for controlling airborne contamination is crucial. Here, the authors recommend best practices for experimental assessments and reporting to ensure a reliable evaluation of new airborne particle filtration media and technologies.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Review Tier 2

A Review of the Sampling, Analysis, and Identification Techniques of Microplastics in the Air: Insights into PM2.5 and PM10

This review systematically compared methods for sampling, analyzing, and identifying microplastics in air, with special focus on the PM2.5 and PM10 fine particle fractions that are most relevant to human respiratory health. The paper identifies key gaps and recommends standardized protocols to improve comparability of airborne microplastic research.

Article Tier 2

Development of screening criteria for microplastic particles in air and atmospheric deposition: critical review and applicability towards assessing human exposure

Researchers evaluated 27 studies on microplastics in air and found that most scored below 50% on quality criteria — particularly for contamination controls and measuring particles smaller than 10 micrometers — highlighting the need for standardized methods before reliable human inhalation exposure assessments can be made.

Article Tier 2

Tracking Microplastics in the Air: Cutting-edge Methods for Indoor and Outdoor Environments

This study developed a rigorous standardized methodology for sampling and characterizing airborne microplastics in both indoor and outdoor environments, using sonication to separate particulate matter fractions from quartz filter paper. The approach improves quantification comparability across studies, addressing a major limitation in the fragmented airborne microplastic literature.

Article Tier 2

Contextual existence of an optimum through-plane orientation and aspect ratio of a fiber-segment in fibrous air filters

Not relevant to microplastics — this study uses computational fluid dynamics to model how the orientation and shape of fiber segments in air filters affect airborne particle capture efficiency and pressure drop.

Article Tier 2

Development of a standardized methodology for the identification and characterization of airborne microplastics in working spaces

Researchers developed a standardized methodology for identifying and characterizing microplastics in both indoor and outdoor atmospheric samples. The protocol addresses the lack of consistent methods for airborne microplastic monitoring, which is important given the high amount of time people spend indoors.

Share this paper