We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Tracking Microplastics in the Air: Cutting-edge Methods for Indoor and Outdoor Environments
Summary
This study developed a rigorous standardized methodology for sampling and characterizing airborne microplastics in both indoor and outdoor environments, using sonication to separate particulate matter fractions from quartz filter paper. The approach improves quantification comparability across studies, addressing a major limitation in the fragmented airborne microplastic literature.
The scarcity of research work on airborne microplastics may be attributed to a lack of rigorous methodology since studying the microscopic realm of air quality is challenging. Previous studies on airborne microplastics have shown disparate approaches for exploring airborne MPs with little methodological coherence, limiting the comparability of results. This study aims to provide a rigorous methodology to quantify and characterize airborne MPs more precisely. The first step is efficiently separating particulate matter (PM2.5, PM10) from Whatman® quartz filter paper using sonication to recover all the samples. Sample treatment begins with organic matter (OM) removal from sample particles by oxidative digestion using hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (15%) at 70°C (for 1 hour) which is highly efficient and saves time as it would otherwise take 7–8 days at room temperature. Zinc chloride (ZnCl2, 1.6 g cm–3) has been used in density separation of polymers owing to its high efficiency and reusability. It has been demonstrated that ZnCl2 and H2O2 have no negative impacts on sample particles under the given conditions. This method has been proven suitable for environmental samples and can be reproduced within 2 days.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Development of a standardized methodology for the identification and characterization of airborne microplastics in working spaces
Researchers developed a standardized methodology for identifying and characterizing microplastics in both outdoor and indoor atmospheric samples, addressing the absence of harmonized protocols that limits comparability across airborne microplastic studies. The standardized approach improved reproducibility and allowed more accurate assessment of human inhalation exposure in different environments.
A Review of the Sampling, Analysis, and Identification Techniques of Microplastics in the Air: Insights into PM2.5 and PM10
This review systematically compared methods for sampling, analyzing, and identifying microplastics in air, with special focus on the PM2.5 and PM10 fine particle fractions that are most relevant to human respiratory health. The paper identifies key gaps and recommends standardized protocols to improve comparability of airborne microplastic research.
Sampling strategies and analytical techniques for assessment of airborne micro and nano plastics
This review evaluates sampling strategies and analytical techniques for assessing airborne micro- and nanoplastics in indoor and outdoor environments, highlighting methodological limitations and the lack of standardization that hinder cross-study comparisons.
Development of a standardized methodology for the identification and characterization of airborne microplastics in working spaces
Researchers developed a standardized methodology for identifying and characterizing microplastics in both indoor and outdoor atmospheric samples. The protocol addresses the lack of consistent methods for airborne microplastic monitoring, which is important given the high amount of time people spend indoors.
Microplastics and nanoplastics in the air: a review
This review examines the occurrence, sources, physicochemical characteristics, and sampling and analytical methods for microplastics and nanoplastics in atmospheric air across urban, industrial, coastal, and remote environments. The authors find that fibers and fragments are the dominant atmospheric microplastic forms, that no standardized sampling methods currently exist, and that both passive and active collection approaches are used across the literature with limited comparability.