We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microplastic exposure disparities in California communities through bottled water consumption
Summary
This systematic review found that bottled water contains significantly more microplastics than tap water, and that minority and lower-income communities in California who rely more heavily on bottled water face disproportionately higher exposure. The findings highlight that efforts to avoid contaminated tap water may actually increase microplastic intake.
Abstract Increasingly, governmental agencies are taking action in response to health concerns associated with microplastic exposure in drinking water. These efforts have focused primarily on municipal tap water rather than bottled water. This is concerning, given the surge in bottled water consumption in the U.S., a surge partially fueled by negative perceptions of tap water quality, especially among minority communities. Even though microplastics may not be the biggest health risk or primary reason for consumer choices around tap and bottled water, the rising concerns around microplastic exposure and impacts on human health are important to take into consideration. A systematic review was conducted to assess microplastic concentrations in various sources of drinking water, including bottled water and municipal tap water. To facilitate a more accurate comparison of microplastic concentrations between studies, we realigned the analyzed microplastic size classes between studies. Additionally, trends in California household-level bottled water purchases were analyzed using a nationwide dataset of bottled water transactions to determine the corresponding rates of microplastic exposure associated with these consumption patterns. Our results suggest that there is a sevenfold higher concentration of microplastics in bottled water compared to tap water globally. In comparison, studies conducted in the Global North have found a six times higher concentration of microplastics in bottled water compared to tap water, and seven times more microplastics in bottled water compared to tap water in the Global South. While income is found to be positively associated with bottled water purchases and increases in microplastic exposure in California, substantial disparities in exposure persist by ethnicity and race after controlling for income. Although microplastics may not be the primary health risk or the primary reason for consumer choices regarding tap and bottled water, the growing concerns about microplastic exposure and its impacts on human health are important to consider. Choices made by consumers regarding drinking water types, regardless of the reason for these choices, should be made with the best available information. Therefore, our results underscore the importance of addressing information disparities related to bottled water quality. This is particularly important within marginalized communities served by high-quality municipal drinking water, where misperceptions of tap water quality and limited information on bottled water quality contribute to the consumption of bottled water.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Occurrence of Microplastics in Tap and Bottled Water: Current Knowledge
This review summarizes current research on microplastic contamination in both tap and bottled drinking water. Researchers found that microplastics are present in both water sources, with bottled water generally containing higher concentrations than tap water, and smaller particles being more abundant. The study raises public health concerns and emphasizes the need for improved detection methods and drinking water treatment standards.
Insights into human exposure to microplastics through drinking water: Current state of the science
This review analyzed 66 studies on microplastics in drinking water from 2018 to 2023 and found that tap water actually contained more microplastics on average (about 62 particles per liter) than bottled water (about 38 particles per liter). Most particles were small fragments and fibers made of common plastics like PET, polyethylene, and polypropylene. The researchers estimate that people ingest roughly 175 microplastic particles per day just from drinking water alone.
Estimating microplastic consumption
A research summary estimates that people drinking only bottled water consume an additional 90,000 microplastic particles per year compared to those who drink only tap water. The study highlights how packaging and delivery method of drinking water affects microplastic exposure.
Occurrence of microplastics in tap and bottled water, and food packaging: A narrative review on current knowledge
This narrative review compiled findings on microplastic contamination in tap water, bottled water, and food packaging. Researchers found that various types of microplastic fragments have been detected in drinking water sources worldwide, with bottled water generally containing more particles than tap water. The review highlights that food packaging is an additional source of daily microplastic exposure, underscoring the need for better monitoring and regulation.
Occurrence, Characteristics, and Risk Assessment of Microplastics in Tap Water and Bottled Water, China
This systematic review found microplastic contamination in both tap water and bottled water across China, with bottled water showing especially high levels — up to nearly 9,000 particles per liter for the smallest sizes. Fibers and fragments were the most common forms, and packaging degradation was a major contributor in bottled water. The findings raise practical concerns about microplastic exposure from the water we drink every day.