0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Food & Water Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Estimating microplastic consumption

C&EN Global Enterprise 2019 Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Katherine Bourzac

Summary

A research summary estimates that people drinking only bottled water consume an additional 90,000 microplastic particles per year compared to those who drink only tap water. The study highlights how packaging and delivery method of drinking water affects microplastic exposure.

If you get your recommended daily hydration exclusively from bottled water, you’re consuming an additional 90,000 particles of microplastic per year. That’s one of the alarming findings of the first study to take a comprehensive look at available data on human microplastic consumption (Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b01517). Marine ecologist Kieran D. Cox, part of a team led by Sarah E. Dudas at the University of Victoria, and collaborators culled all the high-quality data they could find about microplastic levels in air, water and other beverages, and foods. Then, extrapolating from US-recommended daily allowances and consumption habits, they estimated how much microplastic Americans consume each year. The study is incomplete: data are available for salt, honey, bottled water, fish, and other products, but not for foods that make up 85% of the calories that Americans consume, including meat, grains, and vegetables. From existing data, the researchers estimate that people

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Insights into human exposure to microplastics through drinking water: Current state of the science

This review analyzed 66 studies on microplastics in drinking water from 2018 to 2023 and found that tap water actually contained more microplastics on average (about 62 particles per liter) than bottled water (about 38 particles per liter). Most particles were small fragments and fibers made of common plastics like PET, polyethylene, and polypropylene. The researchers estimate that people ingest roughly 175 microplastic particles per day just from drinking water alone.

Article Tier 2

Occurrence and characterization of microplastics in bottled drinking water

Researchers analyzed microplastics in ten bottled water brands and found up to nine microplastic particles per liter, estimating that people who drink only bottled water may ingest over 150 microplastic particles per year — with polypropylene and polystyrene being the most common types found.

Article Tier 2

Occurrence of Microplastics in Tap and Bottled Water: Current Knowledge

This review summarizes current research on microplastic contamination in both tap and bottled drinking water. Researchers found that microplastics are present in both water sources, with bottled water generally containing higher concentrations than tap water, and smaller particles being more abundant. The study raises public health concerns and emphasizes the need for improved detection methods and drinking water treatment standards.

Review Tier 2

Unveiling the hidden chronic health risks of nano- and microplastics in single-use plastic water bottles: A review

This review examines how single-use plastic water bottles release micro- and nanoplastics into drinking water, with bottled water consumers potentially ingesting up to 90,000 more plastic particles per year than tap water drinkers. The research links chronic exposure to these tiny plastic particles with respiratory diseases, reproductive issues, brain toxicity, and cancer risk, though more standardized testing methods are still needed.

Systematic Review Tier 1

Microplastic exposure disparities in California communities through bottled water consumption

This systematic review found that bottled water contains significantly more microplastics than tap water, and that minority and lower-income communities in California who rely more heavily on bottled water face disproportionately higher exposure. The findings highlight that efforts to avoid contaminated tap water may actually increase microplastic intake.

Share this paper