0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Visual Trackingand Quantitative Analysis of PolystyreneNanoplastics Uptake and Transport across Various Tomato Varieties

Figshare 2025 Score: 38 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Xiaodong Sun (166163), Wenwen Li (735004), Jiawen Pan (20830950), Tao Jia (756099), Jingrui Chen (4531009), Yusong Zhou (13913742), Runze Li (681986), Mengzhan Qin (21195323), Zhiguo Liu (594653), Pedro García-Caparrós (22838662), Peng Liu (120506), Qinghua Shi (169845), Tao Yu (176965)

Summary

Researchers tracked uptake and transport of polystyrene nanoplastics across six tomato cultivars, finding significant varietal differences in accumulation and growth inhibition, with Heinz 1706 being most resistant (13% inhibition) and Moneymaker most sensitive (32% inhibition). Nanoplastics accumulated preferentially in roots and near the xylem in stems and leaves, with shoot concentrations substantially lower than root concentrations.

Polymers

The mechanisms by which plants respond to microplastic pollution are still unclear. To identify resistant varieties for elucidating these mechanisms, this study investigated the differential accumulation and resistance of six tomato cultivars to polystyrene nanoplastics (PS-NPs). Significant varietal differences were observed. Heinz 1706 was the most resistant (13% growth inhibition), while Moneymaker was the most sensitive (32% inhibition). PS-NPs content was significantly lower in shoots than in roots. In stems and leaves, PS-NPs accumulated near the xylem, whereas in roots, they were distributed across all tissues. Translocation factors (TF) also varied, with Ailsa Craig having the highest TF (4.0%) and M82 having the lowest TF (0.89%). Correlation analysis revealed a strong negative relationship between root PS-NPs accumulation and plant growth. These findings provided key insights into microplastic accumulation and resistance factors in plants, forming the foundation for future molecular and physiological studies.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Visual Tracking and Quantitative Analysis of Polystyrene Nanoplastics Uptake and Transport across Various Tomato Varieties

Researchers tracked the uptake and transport of polystyrene nanoplastics across six tomato cultivars, finding significant varietal differences in accumulation and growth inhibition, with Heinz 1706 being most resistant (13% inhibition) and Moneymaker most sensitive (32% inhibition). Nanoplastics accumulated preferentially in roots and near the xylem in stems and leaves, with shoot concentrations substantially lower than root concentrations.

Article Tier 2

Uptake and translocation of nanoplastics in mono and dicot vegetables

Researchers investigated the uptake and translocation of nanoplastics in four vegetable species -- pak choi, tomato, radish, and asparagus -- exposing plants to fluorescently labeled poly(methyl methacrylate) and polystyrene particles of 100 to 500 nm with different surface modifications, and using fluorescence microscopy to confirm nanoparticle entry and movement regardless of size or surface chemistry.

Article Tier 2

MICROPLÁSTICOS Y NANOPLÁSTICOS: UNA REVISIÓN SISTEMÁTICA DE SU IMPACTO EN EL CRECIMIENTO DE TOMATE (Solanum lycopersicum)

This systematic review analysed published studies on the effects of synthetic microplastics and nanoplastics on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) growth, examining how polymer type, particle size, concentration, and growth medium modulate phytotoxicity. The review found that MP and NP exposure consistently impaired biomass accumulation, plant height, flower and fruit production, and root and shoot length, with higher concentrations and smaller particle sizes generally producing the most pronounced negative effects.

Article Tier 2

Effects of polystyrene nanoplastics on tomato plant growth, fruit yield and quality

Researchers investigated how polystyrene nanoplastics affect tomato plant growth and fruit quality, finding that exposure reduced seedling biomass, impaired photosynthesis, and triggered oxidative stress. At higher concentrations, the nanoplastics inhibited mineral uptake and diminished fruit yield along with nutritional quality markers like vitamin C and lycopene. The study highlights that nanoplastic contamination in agricultural soils could pose a meaningful threat to food crop productivity and nutritional value.

Article Tier 2

Transport Dynamicsand Physiological Responses ofPolystyrene Nanoplastics in Pakchoi: Implications for Food Safetyand Environmental Health

Researchers tracked the transport and physiological responses of polystyrene nanoplastics in pakchoi (bok choy) plants, finding that nanoplastics were absorbed through roots and translocated to shoots where they disrupted chlorophyll production and reduced plant growth.

Share this paper