0
Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Remediation Sign in to save

Indoor Microplastics: A Comprehensive Review and Bibliometric Analysis

2023 3 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Mansoor Ahmad Bhat

Summary

This comprehensive review and bibliometric analysis summarizes research on indoor microplastic contamination, covering sampling methods, identification techniques, and concentration levels in dust, deposition, and air samples. Fiber-shaped microplastics are the most commonly detected indoors, with dust and deposition samples showing higher concentrations than air samples.

Abstract The global scale of concern regarding indoor microplastic (MP) pollution is increasing and considering the amount of time people spend indoors. Indoor MP contamination can directly affect the human population through indoor dust and air exposure. This review summarized recent research progress on pretreatments, quality control, filter membranes, identification, keywords used, publication record, and authors' contribution. Comparatively, dust and deposition samples exhibit higher MPs concentrations than indoor air samples. Fiber-shaped MPs are commonly detected indoors, although fragments and films are also present. The color and types of MPs display variability, with polypropylene, polyethylene, polyethylene terephthalate, and polystyrene identified as the dominant MPs. Indoor environments generally demonstrate higher concentrations of MPs than outdoor environments, and MPs in the lower size range (1–100 µm) are typically more abundant. Among the reviewed articles, 45.24% conducted pretreatment on their samples, while 16.67% did not undergo any pretreatment. The predominant filter utilized in most studies was the Whatman Glass microfiber filter (41.67%), and MPs were predominantly characterized using µ-FTIR (19.23%). Within the examined literature, 17 articles incorporated blank samples into their research, while 8 articles did not include blank samples. Notably, most studies (23) did not integrate blank results into their samples. A significant increase in published articles has been observed since 2020, with an annual growth rate exceeding 10%. Bibliometric analysis of the literature review identified 35 authors who have contributed relevant material on indoor MPs. The keyword microplastics had the highest frequency, followed by fibers.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Review Tier 2

Indoor microplastics: a comprehensive review and bibliometric analysis

This review summarizes research on microplastic pollution inside buildings, where people spend most of their time. Indoor environments generally have higher microplastic concentrations than outdoors, with fiber-shaped particles from synthetic textiles being the most common type. Since people inhale and ingest these particles daily, indoor microplastic exposure may be a significant and underappreciated route of human health risk.

Article Tier 2

Unravelling the microplastic contamination: A comprehensive analysis of microplastics in indoor house dust

This study provides a detailed analysis of microplastics found in indoor house dust, where people spend most of their time. Fibers were the most common type found, originating from textiles, carpets, and clothing, with plastic sizes and types varying across different household areas. The findings highlight that everyday indoor environments are a significant source of microplastic exposure through inhalation and ingestion of dust.

Article Tier 2

Characterization and quantification of microplastics in indoor environments

Researchers measured airborne microplastics in indoor spaces including offices, labs, dining halls, and dormitories. Dormitories had the highest microplastic levels, with fibers being the most common shape found. The study highlights that people are regularly inhaling microplastics indoors, where they spend the majority of their time.

Review Tier 2

A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of sources and analytical approaches of indoor microplastics

Researchers systematically reviewed the scientific literature on microplastics in indoor air and found a sharp rise in research after 2017, likely spurred by COVID-19 pandemic attention to indoor air quality. The review highlights that sources like synthetic textiles, furniture, and ventilation systems contribute to indoor microplastic exposure, but standardized measurement methods are still lacking.

Article Tier 2

The Occurrence of Microplastics in the Indoor Environment

This book examines the occurrence of microplastics in indoor environments, covering sources, accumulation patterns, and implications for human exposure. It compiles research on indoor microplastic contamination as a growing area of concern distinct from outdoor and aquatic pollution.

Share this paper