Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Gut & Microbiome Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Microplastics in Marine Sediments from Dar es Salaam Coast: Spatial Distribution and Characterization

Tanzania Journal of Science 2023 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.

Macarius Pancras Mtega, Macarius Pancras Mtega, Macarius Pancras Mtega, Macarius Pancras Mtega, Macarius Pancras Mtega, Macarius Pancras Mtega, Matobola Joel Mihale, Matobola Joel Mihale, Matobola Joel Mihale, Kessy F. Kilulya Kessy F. Kilulya Kessy F. Kilulya Kessy F. Kilulya

Summary

Researchers found microplastic contamination in marine sediments at four beaches along the Dar es Salaam coast in Tanzania, with the highest concentrations near the surface layer. Identified polymers included polypropylene, polyethylene, polyurethane, and polyamide in fiber, fragment, sponge, and pellet forms.

Polymers

PA PE PET PP PTFE PU PVC

Study Type Environmental

The purpose of the research was to determine the spatial distribution and characterization of microplastics in marine sediments of beaches along the Indian Ocean of Dar es Salaam coast. The sediment samples were extracted in triplicate using floatation method followed by digestion of organic debris, then analyzed using At-FTIR spectrophotometer and stereomicroscope. The mean concentrations of microplastics for Kijichi Beach were 700 ± 907 particles/m2 at 1 cm, 859 ± 839 particles/m2 at 5 cm and 590 ± 782 particles/m2 at 10 cm; from Palm Beach were 157 ± 15 particles/m2 at 1 cm, 130 ± 182 particles/m2 at 5 cm and 16 ± 0 particles/m2 at 10 cm; from Coco Beach were 167 ± 155 particles/m2 at 1cm, 104 ± 100 particles/m2 at 5 cm, 70 ± 86 particles/m2 at 10 cm; from Mbezi Beach were 115 ± 108 particles/m2 at 1cm, 74 ± 82 particles/m2 at 5 cm and 16 ± 0 particles/m2 at 10 cm. The microplastics were polypropylene, polyethylene, polyurethane, polyamide, polyvinyl chloride, polyethylene terephthalate, and polytetrafluoroethylene, in the form of fibres, fragments, sponges and pellets. The sediments were confirmed to be contaminated with microplastics with high amount at 1 cm compared to other profile location.

Read via DOI Download PDF

Share this paper

Post Share Share Pin Email