0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Vertical distribution of microplastics in a river water column using an innovative sampling method

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2023 16 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Gabriel Pasquier, Gabriel Pasquier, Gabriel Pasquier, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Rachid Amara Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Guillaume Duflos, Périne Doyen, Alexandre Dehaut, Gabriel Pasquier, Rachid Amara Rachid Amara Rachid Amara Périne Doyen, Périne Doyen, Périne Doyen, Périne Doyen, Périne Doyen, Périne Doyen, Périne Doyen, Périne Doyen, Périne Doyen, Périne Doyen, Périne Doyen, Périne Doyen, Guillaume Duflos, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Guillaume Duflos, Alexandre Dehaut, Guillaume Duflos, Guillaume Duflos, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Guillaume Duflos, Guillaume Veillet, Guillaume Veillet, Alexandre Dehaut, Guillaume Duflos, Périne Doyen, Périne Doyen, Guillaume Veillet, Guillaume Veillet, Rachid Amara Alexandre Dehaut, Rachid Amara Alexandre Dehaut, Rachid Amara Guillaume Veillet, Guillaume Veillet, Alexandre Dehaut, Guillaume Duflos, Guillaume Veillet, Guillaume Veillet, Rachid Amara Guillaume Duflos, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Rachid Amara Rachid Amara Guillaume Duflos, Guillaume Veillet, Rachid Amara Guillaume Duflos, Guillaume Duflos, Guillaume Duflos, Guillaume Duflos, Alexandre Dehaut, Guillaume Veillet, Rachid Amara Rachid Amara Alexandre Dehaut, Guillaume Duflos, Rachid Amara Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Guillaume Duflos, Guillaume Duflos, Alexandre Dehaut, Rachid Amara Rachid Amara Rachid Amara Rachid Amara Guillaume Duflos, Alexandre Dehaut, Rachid Amara Rachid Amara Guillaume Duflos, Rachid Amara Guillaume Duflos, Rachid Amara Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Guillaume Duflos, Guillaume Duflos, Alexandre Dehaut, Alexandre Dehaut, Périne Doyen, Périne Doyen, Alexandre Dehaut, Guillaume Duflos, Guillaume Duflos, Guillaume Duflos, Guillaume Duflos, Guillaume Duflos, Rachid Amara Guillaume Duflos, Guillaume Duflos, Alexandre Dehaut, Guillaume Duflos, Guillaume Duflos, Guillaume Duflos, Rachid Amara Rachid Amara

Summary

An innovative sampling method was used to assess microplastic contamination in both surface and subsurface river water, finding higher MP concentrations near the riverbed than at the surface, highlighting that surface-only sampling underestimates total MP contamination in rivers.

Study Type Environmental

Due to limitations of sampling methods, subsurface water is usually a less well-investigated compartment of the water column when scientists assess microplastic contamination. In this study, microplastic (MP) contamination was assessed in a freshwater river both in surface and subsurface using an innovative sampling method. Microplastic contamination in the lower part of the water column, i.e., near-bottom water and in sediments, was also studied. Three sampling campaigns were carried out during different weather conditions: stormy, rainy, and dry in order to observe their influence on the microplastics vertical distribution. No significant difference was observed between the abundance and types of MPs in surface and subsurface water. The proportion of polymer with theoretical density < 1 (polypropylene d = 0.9, polyethylene d = 0.91-0.95) and polystyrene (d = 0.1-1.06) in the surface and subsurface samples was 73.5%, and this proportion drops to 40.8% for the samples located in the near-bottom water and the sediments. Our results indicate that the MP concentration of the different compartments analyzed can be significantly influenced by rainfall during and prior to the sampling day. This study highlights that in shallow rivers, surface water sampling is representative of the water column MP contamination, but that sampling without taking environmental conditions into account may lead to erroneous estimation of MPs concentration and flux entering the marine environment.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper