We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microplastic biodegradability does not modify plant carbon input in soil but accelerate soil carbon loss in agroecosystems
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers investigated how non-biodegradable polyethylene (PE) and biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA) microplastics affect plant carbon input and soil carbon turnover in a dryland agroecosystem over two years using 13CO2 pulse-labeling. They found that both microplastic types did not significantly alter plant carbon fixation but accelerated soil carbon loss, with implications for climate change feedbacks in agricultural soils.
Abstract Microplastics (MPs) are emerging contaminants that disrupt terrestrial carbon (C) cycling, yet how their biodegradability modulates the turnover of plant‐derived C remains unclear. Here, we investigated how two widely used MPs—non‐biodegradable polyethylene (PE) and biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA)—affected the fate of photosynthetically fixed C in a dryland agroecosystem. The goal was to explore how MPs influenced C fluxes across the soil–plant‐atmosphere continuum (SPAC) and assess their implications on climate change. We conducted a two‐year field experiment to evaluate how PE and PLA‐based MPs affected plant photosynthetic C fixation and its subsequent turnover in soil. Using 13 CO 2 pulse‐labelling, we traced the flow of photosynthetically fixed C across the SPAC under low, medium and high MP concentrations. We quantified: (i) 13 C distribution in plant shoots, roots and bulk soil; (ii) 13 C allocation among soil aggregate size fractions; and (iii) microbial EEAs, CAZy gene abundance and soil respiration dynamics. Soil C sink capacity tended to decline for both MPs types, as cumulative soil CO 2 emissions increased. On average, 13 C retained in soil decreased from 50.8 to 41.1 mg m −2 in MPs treatments, relative to the control. Interestingly, the underlying mechanisms differed among MP types. Non‐biodegradable PE‐MPs weakened soil aggregation and reduced 13 C retention in macroaggregates. However, biodegradable PLA‐MPs generated marginal effects on aggregation and enhanced the activity of microbial hydrolase, which negatively affected C retention. Moreover, metagenomics confirmed that PLA‐MPs enhanced microbial decomposition capacity by enriching C degradation and energy metabolism genes. Finally, photosynthetic C assimilation remained unchanged with increasing MP concentrations, regardless of MP types. Synthesis and applications . Both MP types can evidently impair soil C pools and differentially alter soil C cycling via the biodegradation‐dependent mechanisms. These findings challenge the widely held assumption that biodegradable MPs are inherently environmentally benign, as their presence in soils undermines C storage capacity. The findings offer insights into future applications as follows: (1) to phase down the increment and stock of soil MPs, in favour of truly green alternatives of plastic mulching; (2) to update the estimation methods of soil C emissions in global terrestrial ecosystems considering the presence of soil MPs.
More Papers Like This
Data from: Microplastic biodegradability does not modify plant carbon input in soil but accelerate soil carbon loss in agroecosystems
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers found that both non-biodegradable polyethylene and biodegradable polylactic acid microplastics accelerated soil carbon loss in a two-year dryland field experiment, with biodegradable plastics not modifying plant carbon input but both types disrupting the soil-plant-atmosphere carbon continuum.
Biodegradable microplastics decreased plant-derived and increased microbial-derived carbon formation in soil: a two-year field trial
AI summary Read the abstract
A two-year field experiment compared the effects of conventional (polypropylene) and biodegradable (polylactic acid, PLA) microplastics on soil carbon cycling in agricultural soil. Researchers found that while neither plastic type changed total soil carbon levels, PLA microplastics significantly reduced plant-derived carbon (lignin) by 32% while boosting microbial-derived carbon, suggesting that "biodegradable" plastics still meaningfully alter soil biology and chemistry. This matters because it challenges the assumption that biodegradable plastics are environmentally benign once they break down in farmland.
Microplastic-Induced Alterations in Soil Aggregate-Associated Carbon Stabilization Pathways: Evidence from δ13C Signature Analysis
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers conducted a year-long field experiment to understand how different types of microplastics affect carbon storage in soil. They found that conventional plastics like polyethylene and PVC destabilized soil structures and released stored carbon, while biodegradable plastics like PLA and PHA helped maintain soil integrity. The study provides evidence that the type of plastic contaminating agricultural soils significantly influences whether carbon is retained or lost.
Effect of different polymers of microplastics on soil organic carbon and nitrogen – A mesocosm experiment
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers found that adding polyethylene and biodegradable microplastics to agricultural soil altered carbon and nitrogen dynamics, with biodegradable microplastics having stronger effects on soil organic carbon decomposition and nutrient cycling than conventional plastics.
Differential carbon accumulation of microbial necromass and plant lignin by pollution of polyethylene and polylactic acid microplastics in soil
AI summary Read the abstract
This study found that both conventional polyethylene and biodegradable polylactic acid microplastics changed how carbon is stored in soil. The plastics increased carbon from dead microbes while decreasing carbon from plant material, with most of the additional soil carbon coming from fungal remains. These changes to soil chemistry matter because they could affect agricultural productivity and the ability of soil to store carbon, with broader implications for climate and food systems.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.