0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Exploration of microplastic concentration in indoor and outdoor air samples: Morphological, polymeric, and elemental analysis

The Science of The Total Environment 2023 72 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 65 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Khadija Sharaf Din, Khadija Sharaf Din, Khadija Sharaf Din, Khadija Sharaf Din, Khadija Sharaf Din, Muhammad Fahim Khokhar, Khadija Sharaf Din, Abdul Qadir Abdul Qadir Abdul Qadir Abdul Qadir Abdul Qadir Abdul Qadir Abdul Qadir Abdul Qadir Abdul Qadir Abdul Qadir Abdul Qadir Abdul Qadir Abdul Qadir Abdul Qadir Muhammad Fahim Khokhar, Muhammad Fahim Khokhar, Muhammad Fahim Khokhar, Shahid Ikramullah Butt, Farhan Younas, Abdul Qadir Abdul Qadir Abdul Qadir Abdul Qadir Abdul Qadir Abdul Qadir Abdul Qadir Farhan Younas, Farhan Younas, Abdul Qadir Abdul Qadir Abdul Qadir Abdul Qadir

Summary

Researchers measured airborne microplastics in indoor and outdoor environments in Islamabad, Pakistan, finding that indoor air contained nearly five times more microplastics than outdoor air. Classrooms had the highest contamination at about 6 particles per cubic meter, with fibers being the most common shape and polyester (PET) the most common plastic type. These findings highlight that people are continuously inhaling microplastics, especially indoors.

Microplastics are ubiquitously pervasive throughout the environment, but unlike aquatic and terrestrial microplastics, airborne microplastics have received less scientific attention. This study is the first of its kind to explicitly examine microplastics in the indoor and outdoor air (PM) samples collected using active air samplers in Islamabad, Pakistan. The suspected synthetic particles were analyzed using ATR-FTIR, μ-Raman and SEM-EDX to categorize them based on their morphological characteristics, polymeric composition, and elemental makeup. Microplastics were found in all indoor and outdoor air samples, with indoor air samples (4.34 ± 1.93 items/m) being significantly more contaminated than outdoor air samples (0.93 ± 0.32 items/m) (P < 0.001). Among all the indoor air samples, samples taken from classroom (6.12 ± 0.51 items/m) were more contaminated than samples taken from hallway (4.94 ± 0.78 items/m) and laboratory (1.96 ± 0.44 items/m). Fibers were found to be the prevalent shape type in indoor and outdoor airborne microplastics followed by fragments. Transparent- and black colored microplastic particles were predominant in both indoor and outdoor air samples. According to ATR-FTIR analysis, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), and polystyrene (PS) were the most prevalent polymer types in both indoor and outdoor environments. Results from μ-Raman analysis corroborated the presence of the polymers identified by ATR-FTIR. Morphological analysis of particles by SEM indicated signs of weathering on particles' surface i.e., grooves, breaks, shredded edges, pits etc. SEM-EDX of randomly chosen particles unraveled the presence of C and O as core elements, along with the presence of heavy metals at some spots due to foreign material adhering to their surface. Correlation analysis of environmental factors i.e., PM, relative humidity, temperature, and wind speed with MPs abundance revealed non-significant relationships. The findings of this study call for further research on airborne MPs to better comprehend their dispersion, toxicity, interactions with other air pollutants, and attributable health risks.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper