We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Characterization of the degradation products of biodegradable and traditional plastics on UV irradiation and mechanical abrasion
Summary
Researchers compared how biodegradable plastic (PBAT/PLA) and traditional polyethylene break down under UV light and mechanical wear over nine months. The biodegradable plastic degraded faster but released more nanoplastics and dissolved molecules under UV light, while traditional plastic mainly produced larger microplastic fragments. This suggests that biodegradable plastics, while breaking down more quickly, may generate more of the smallest and potentially most harmful plastic particles.
Biodegradable plastics are popular alternatives to traditional plastics in packaging, mulch sheets, and other applications. However, there are concerns regarding the potential for pollution as a result of their abiotic degradation. In this study, we investigated the degradation of biodegradable polybutylene adipate terephthalate/polylactic acid (PBAT/PLA) and traditional polyethylene (PE) plastic under two typical abiotic conditions: ultraviolet (UV) irradiation and mechanical abrasion (MA) for up to nine months. The physical and chemical properties of the two plastics during the degradation period were assessed. In addition, quantitative analysis of the degradation products was carried out using a new method called membrane filtration and total organic carbon determination (MF-TOCD). The results revealed that PBAT/PLA underwent a greater number of changes in surface morphology, thermal stability, and mass loss compared to PE when exposed to UV and MA during the test period. Further analysis of the released products revealed that PBAT/PLA released more products than PE. Overall, PE mainly produced microplastics (MPs) larger than 0.22 μm, whereas PBAT/PLA produced products <0.22 μm (nanoplastics and soluble molecules) on UV exposure. In contrast, when subjected to MA, PBAT/PLA produced MPs larger than 0.22 μm, and these accumulated gradually; this behavior is similar to that of PE. By combining the mass loss and the TOC data for the degradation products, we determined that long-term UV irradiation generated a large number of smaller particles from PBAT/PLA that could further degrade rather than accumulate in the environment. In summary, we established a new method to separate and characterize MPs as well as nanoplastics and soluble molecules, and provided new insights into the fate of PBAT/PLA during abiotic degradation.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Micro- and nanoplastics released from biodegradable and conventional plastics during degradation: Formation, aging factors, and toxicity
Researchers compared how biodegradable and conventional plastics break down into micro- and nanoplastics during degradation, testing the effects of UV light and mechanical forces. They found that biodegradable plastics like PLA and PBS can produce significant quantities of secondary microplastics, challenging the assumption that they are entirely safe alternatives. The study highlights the need for risk assessments of biodegradable plastics, particularly the tiny fragments generated as they break down.
Microplastics generated from a biodegradable plastic in freshwater and seawater
Researchers compared microplastic generation from a biodegradable plastic (PBAT) and conventional polyethylene in water and found that the biodegradable plastic actually produced far more microplastic fragments. Exposure to UV light, which simulates sunlight, dramatically accelerated the fragmentation of the biodegradable material. This finding challenges the assumption that biodegradable plastics are a straightforward solution to plastic pollution, since they may create more microplastics during the breakdown process.
Degradation of Biodegradable Microplastics under Artificially Controlled Aging Conditions with UV Radiation
Researchers subjected biodegradable plastics to controlled UV aging and found that they fragmented into microplastics faster than conventional plastics under simulated outdoor conditions. Biodegradable plastics are promoted as an eco-friendly alternative, but this study shows they may actually create microplastic pollution more rapidly in real-world environments. The findings raise important questions about whether biodegradable plastics are a genuine solution to plastic pollution.
Comparing the Aging Processes of PLA and PE: The Impact of UV Irradiation and Water
Scientists compared how biodegradable PLA plastic and conventional polyethylene break down under UV light and water exposure. PLA degraded more severely, fragmenting into smaller particles more readily than polyethylene, though both types developed surface cracks and chemical changes. Understanding how different plastics age is important because smaller, more degraded particles may be more easily absorbed by living organisms and potentially cause greater harm.
Insights into the photoaging behavior of biodegradable and nondegradable microplastics: Spectroscopic and molecular characteristics of dissolved organic matter release
Researchers compared how biodegradable and conventional microplastics break down under ultraviolet light and what dissolved substances they release. They found that biodegradable PLA microplastics released more protein-like organic matter during UV exposure than conventional polystyrene, and this matter was more readily used by microorganisms. The study suggests that biodegradable plastics, while designed to be better for the environment, may introduce different ecological risks as they break down.