0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Sign in to save

Interlaboratory Comparison Reveals State of the Art in Microplastic Detection and Quantification Methods - Supporting Information

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2025 Score: 38 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
ANDREA MARIO GIOVANNOZZI, ANDREA MARIO GIOVANNOZZI, K. Altmann, K. Altmann

Summary

This study presents supporting information for a large-scale interlaboratory comparison involving more than 50 laboratories worldwide, assessing the state of the art in microplastic detection and quantification methods. The supplementary data includes detailed performance comparisons of µ-FTIR, µ-Raman, and other techniques for measuring PE and PET microplastics across different size classes.

Polymers

This file contains the Supporting Information associated with the publication “Interlaboratory comparison reveals state-of-the-art in microplastic detection and quantification methods”. Anal. Chem. 2025, 97, 16, 8719–8728 The document provides detailed supplementary material supporting the results of a large-scale interlaboratory comparison involving more than 50 laboratories worldwide. It includes extended methodological descriptions, statistical analyses, tables, and figures that complement the main manuscript. Specifically, the file reports: Detailed results of particle number and mass fraction measurements for polyethylene (PE) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) microplastics across different size classes; Comparative performance of analytical techniques, including µ-FTIR, µ-Raman, LDIR, SEM-based counting, and thermo-analytical methods; Statistical evaluation of inter- and intra-laboratory variability following ISO 5725-2; Identification of major sources of uncertainty in microplastic analysis; Recommendations for best practices in sample preparation, instrumental settings, calibration, particle counting, and data extrapolation. Although no standalone raw datasets are provided, this Supporting Information contains comprehensive tabulated data and aggregated results that underpin the conclusions of the associated publication. The material is intended to support transparency, reproducibility, and harmonisation efforts in microplastic detection and quantification methods. Funding acknowledgement “The project 21GRD07 PlasticTrace has received funding from the European Partnership on Metrology, co-financed from the European Union’s Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Programme and by the Participating States.” Metadata information:• Funder name: European Partnership on Metrology• Funder ID: 10.13039/100019599• Grant number: 21GRD07 PlasticTrace

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Interlaboratory Comparison Reveals State of the Art in Microplastic Detection and Quantification Methods - Supporting Information

This study presents supporting information for a large-scale interlaboratory comparison involving more than 50 laboratories worldwide, assessing the state of the art in microplastic detection and quantification methods. The supplementary data includes detailed performance comparisons of µ-FTIR, µ-Raman, and other techniques for measuring PE and PET microplastics across different size classes.

Article Tier 2

Interlaboratory Comparison Reveals State of the Art in Microplastic Detection and Quantification Methods

This large international study compared how 84 laboratories around the world performed when identifying and measuring microplastics using five common detection methods. The results showed significant differences between labs, with spectroscopy-based methods generally outperforming heat-based techniques for accuracy. The findings highlight that standardized methods are urgently needed so that microplastic measurements in food, water, and the environment can be reliably compared across studies.

Article Tier 2

Analytical tools in advancing microplastics research for identification and quantification across environmental media: from sample to insight

Researchers reviewed the analytical tools most commonly used for identifying and quantifying microplastics, focusing on FTIR and Raman spectroscopy as the two primary methods. The review compared their strengths and limitations and provided guidance for choosing between them based on particle size, sample matrix, and research objectives.

Article Tier 2

Innovative reference materials for method validation in microplastic analysis including interlaboratory comparison exercises

Researchers developed innovative reference materials for validating microplastic analysis methods, presenting interlaboratory comparison results that support quality assurance and standardization in the growing field of microplastic detection.

Article Tier 2

Implications of method- and instrument-based size detection limits in μFTIR-based microplastic analysis

This study quantified how both instrument detection limits and methodological choices in micro-FTIR analysis affect reported microplastic concentrations, finding these factors substantially influence numerical results and urging standardization before cross-study comparisons are made.

Share this paper