We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Implications of method- and instrument-based size detection limits in μFTIR-based microplastic analysis
AI summary Read the abstract
This study quantified how both instrument detection limits and methodological choices in micro-FTIR analysis affect reported microplastic concentrations, finding these factors substantially influence numerical results and urging standardization before cross-study comparisons are made.
Spectroscopic detection methods are considered the gold standard in microplastic research, but they are not yet fully standardized. Results, such as numerical concentrations from different studies, are often reported and compared without considering all the relevant factors during the analysis process that may influence these concentrations. For the first time, we quantify the influence of both the sieve mesh sizes used during laboratory microplastic extraction and the choice of objective (4×, 15×, or 25× magnification) in μFTIR analysis on microplastics number and mass concentrations in suspended solids samples from two Dutch rivers. A high-resolution μFTIR objective and thus lower size detection limit enhances the detection of particles just above this limit, thereby increasing the total number of detected particles. Size distributions captured with a 4× objective (20.6 μm pixel resolution) differed significantly from those with a 15× (5.5 μm) and 25× objective (3.3 μm), while the results for the 15× and 25× objectives were more comparable. Using the 15× objective appears to be a reasonable choice, as lowering the detection limit further would only marginally improve results while significantly increasing workload. During extraction, sieves with mesh sizes of 20 μm and 5 μm did not produce sharp size cut-offs. By applying cascade filtration, it was possible to determine whether the actual size boundaries of the retained particles matched these nominal limits. Our findings indicate that 14-38 % of the particles are nominally either too large or too small to be retained by a given sieve mesh size. Due to negligible differences for polymer type and size distributions found on the 20 and 5 μm sieves, the 20 μm sieve is recommended for an improved time efficiency in microplastic analysis. To further improve comparability across studies, we recommend expanding datasets as measured here so that read-across techniques can be developed, allowing conversion between the diverse resolutions and mesh sizes applied.
More Papers Like This
Inter-equipment reliable identification of microplastics by micro-FTIR using low computational resources
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers developed a low-computational-resource method for reliable microplastic identification by micro-FTIR spectroscopy that performs consistently across different instruments. The approach, funded under the EU PlasticTrace metrology project, addresses inter-equipment variability — a major barrier to harmonized microplastic monitoring — enabling more comparable results across laboratories.
Inter-equipment reliable identification of microplastics by micro-FTIR using low computational resources
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers developed a low-computational-resource method for reliable microplastic identification by micro-FTIR spectroscopy that performs consistently across different instruments. The approach, funded under the EU PlasticTrace metrology project, addresses inter-equipment variability — a major barrier to harmonized microplastic monitoring — enabling more comparable results across laboratories.
A Comparison of Different Approaches for Characterizing Microplastics in Selected Personal Care Products
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared particle size analysis, light microscopy, and imaging flow cytometry combined with micro-FTIR spectroscopy for characterizing microplastics in personal care products, finding that methodology choice significantly affects quantification results and highlighting the need for standardized approaches.
Towards standardization of method for microplastics analysis using infrared microscopy
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper evaluated and compared different infrared microscopy protocols for identifying microplastics in environmental samples, working toward standardization of measurement methods across laboratories. Lack of standardized methods is a major obstacle to comparing microplastic data across studies and building a consistent picture of global contamination.
Automated analysis of microplastics based on vibrational spectroscopy: Are we measuring the same metrics?
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared three automated spectroscopy-based methods for microplastic analysis — laser direct infrared, Raman, and focal-plane array FTIR imaging — and found they produce inconsistent particle counts and material identifications. Each method has distinct strengths and limitations by particle size, so results from different techniques are not directly comparable.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.