We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microplastic-pathogen interactions differentially modulate tomato Fusarium wilt severity: The dependence of polymer biodegradability
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers investigated how different types of microplastics affect Fusarium wilt severity in tomato plants and found that the impact depends on whether the plastic is biodegradable or conventional. Conventional polyethylene microplastics tended to worsen the disease by altering rhizosphere microbial communities, while biodegradable plastics showed different effects. The study reveals that the biodegradability of microplastics is an important factor in how they interact with soil-borne plant pathogens.
Microplastics (MPs) are pervasively present in agricultural soils, adversely affecting rhizosphere ecology and plant physiology; however, their influence on soil-borne pathogens and crop health remains poorly understood. Here, we systematically investigate the effects of exogenous MPs on Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (FOL) colonization, virulence and antagonistic network in tomato rhizosphere using hydroponic, soil-based, and in vitro co-culture assays. We found that conventional polyethylene (PE) exacerbated wilt severity by 19 %, whereas biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA) reduced it by 14 %. This divergence arose from MP-mediated pathogen colonization patterns: PE adhered to root surfaces and facilitated colonization, whereas PLA leachates generated during degradation suppressed growth. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis and in vitro antifungal assays identified two key antifungal pathways: the intermediate L-lactide induced rhizosphere acidification, and the leached plasticizer tris(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate, which exhibited direct antifungal activity (minimum inhibitory concentration = 50 mg·L; inhibition rate = 15.5 %). Transcriptomic profiling revealed that PE upregulated N transport and metabolism genes in FOL, whereas PLA downregulated the expression of the plant cell wall-degrading enzyme gene FOXG_11947 (log fold change = -3.18), reducing β-1,3-glucanase activity by 75.5 %, and consequently impairing pathogen virulence toward the host roots. Beyond singular interaction with FOL, PLA shifted rhizosphere microbiome toward an antagonistic network, which consequently reduced Fusarium abundance by 1.31 %. Our findings establish a polymer-dependent mechanism by which MPs regulate soil-borne disease and underscore an underappreciated co-exposure threat, providing a scientific basis for sustainable plastic use in agriculture.
More Papers Like This
Biodegradable microplastics affect tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) growth by interfering rhizosphere key phylotypes
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists found that biodegradable microplastics, often promoted as eco-friendly alternatives, can negatively affect tomato plant growth by disrupting beneficial soil bacteria around the roots. This suggests that even plastics designed to break down in the environment may still pose risks to agriculture and food production as they degrade into microplastic fragments.
Multi-omics reveals different impact patterns of conventional and biodegradable microplastics on the crop rhizosphere in a biofertilizer environment
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers used advanced multi-omics techniques to compare how conventional polyethylene microplastics and biodegradable plastic microplastics affect the root zone of crops grown with biofertilizer. They found that both types disrupted the soil microbial community, but through different mechanisms, with biodegradable plastics unexpectedly causing more changes to the bacterial community structure. The study suggests that even biodegradable agricultural plastics may interfere with the effectiveness of biofertilizers in soil.
Differential fungal assemblages and functions between the plastisphere of biodegradable and conventional microplastics in farmland
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared the fungal communities growing on biodegradable and conventional plastic microplastics buried in farmland soil in China. Biodegradable plastics attracted more fungi capable of breaking down plastic, but also harbored more plant and animal pathogens than conventional plastics. This suggests that even biodegradable microplastics in farm soil could pose risks to crop health and potentially introduce harmful organisms into the agricultural environment.
The varied effects of different microplastics on stem development and carbon-nitrogen metabolism in tomato
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tested how six different types of microplastics, including both conventional and biodegradable varieties, affect tomato plant growth. All types disrupted the plants' internal structure and altered how they processed carbon and nitrogen, with PVC causing the most severe damage. Notably, biodegradable plastics like PLA and PBS were not harmless either, suggesting that switching to so-called eco-friendly plastics may not fully protect agricultural soil and food crops from microplastic contamination.
Distinct influence of conventional and biodegradable microplastics on microbe-driving nitrogen cycling processes in soils and plastispheres as evaluated by metagenomic analysis
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared how conventional polyethylene and biodegradable microplastics affect nitrogen cycling by soil microbes. They found that biodegradable microplastics caused stronger changes to microbial communities and nitrogen processing pathways than conventional plastics, particularly by enriching certain bacteria on their surfaces. The study suggests that even biodegradable plastic mulch alternatives may significantly alter soil nutrient cycling in agricultural settings.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.