0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Tracking the plastic footprint: a bibliometric mapping of microplastics research in Asia (2015–2025)

Waste Management Bulletin 2025 Score: 48 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Ronilo P. Antonio

Summary

Researchers conducted a bibliometric analysis of 3,797 Scopus-indexed Asian microplastics publications from 2015 to 2025, mapping research output, key contributors, and intellectual foundations. They found exponential growth since 2019 with China, India, and Indonesia leading, and identified four core research clusters—environmental occurrence, toxicology, food chain contamination, and remediation—as the field's intellectual pillars in Asia.

• This study provides the first comprehensive bibliometric analysis of 3,797 Scopus-indexed publications on microplastics research in Asia from 2015 to 2025 • Results reveal an exponential growth of research output since 2019, with China, India, and Indonesia emerging as leading contributors to global knowledge production. • Co-citation analysis identifies four intellectual foundations of the field: foundational reviews, environmental pathways, global plastics accounting, and ecological impacts. • Co-word analysis uncovers three thematic domains—pollution sources and detection, ecological and biological effects, and environmental fate and transport—showing the field’s thematic evolution. • Findings demonstrate a paradigm shift from descriptive studies to interdisciplinary, solution-oriented research, informing policy, risk assessment, and governance strategies for mitigating the microplastics crisis. The accelerating crisis of microplastic pollution poses urgent environmental and public health challenges, yet despite Asia’s pivotal role as both a major source of plastic leakage and a rapidly growing research hub, no study has systematically mapped its scholarly landscape over the past decade. This study addresses this gap by conducting a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of 3,797 Scopus-indexed articles published between 2015 and 2025, employing an integrated approach that combines performance analysis, co-citation analysis, and co-word analysis using VOSviewer software. The results reveal an exponential surge in research output since 2019, with China, India, and Indonesia emerging as key contributors. Citation analysis highlights seminal works on atmospheric transport, soil contamination, and human ingestion as influential drivers of the field. Co-citation mapping identifies four intellectual clusters, mainly foundational conceptual frameworks, environmental pathways, global plastics accounting, and ecological impacts. Meanwhile co-word analysis uncovers three thematic domains: pollution sources and detection, ecological and biological effects, and environmental fate and transport. Overlay visualization further demonstrates a temporal shift from early descriptive and methodological studies toward interdisciplinary, solution-oriented research integrating ecological risk assessment and human health concerns. By synthesizing a decade of scholarship, this study provides a critical evidence base for guiding future research priorities and informs risk assessment strategies, policy design, and global governance efforts aimed at mitigating the escalating microplastics crisis.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Global research hotspots and trends on microplastics: a bibliometric analysis

A bibliometric analysis of microplastics publications from 1990 to 2022 found a 19-fold increase in publications and 35-fold increase in citations since 2015, with research clustering around distribution, toxicity, analytical methods, and adsorption of co-pollutants.

Article Tier 2

Research landscape of a global environmental challenge: Microplastics

This bibliometric analysis mapped global microplastic research output, finding a sharp increase in publications since 2006 and identifying China, the USA, and Germany as the most prolific contributors. The study distinguishes between primary microplastics (industrially produced) and secondary microplastics (formed by fragmentation) and contextualizes their global distribution.

Article Tier 2

Studi Bibliometrik: Analisis Tren dan Pemetaan Pengetahuan Mikroplastik Serta Dampak Kesehatan di ASEAN: Studi Bibliometrik Berbasis Scopus (2019-2024)

This Indonesian bibliometric study analyzed Scopus publications (2019–2024) on microplastics and health impacts in ASEAN countries to map research trends and knowledge gaps in the region. The analysis found that ASEAN microplastic research has grown substantially but remains limited relative to the region's high plastic pollution burden, and identified aquatic ecosystem contamination and food safety as the dominant themes.

Article Tier 2

Scientometric analysis and scientific trends on microplastics research

Researchers performed a scientometric analysis of microplastics research using 2,872 publications from the Web of Science database spanning 2004 to 2020. The bibliometric analysis mapped contributing countries, institutions, key authors, trending keywords, and future research directions in the field. The study found that microplastics research has grown rapidly, with increasing attention to environmental pollution across various ecosystems.

Article Tier 2

Kontaminasi Mikroplastik Pada Sumber Air Minum: Pemetaan Bibliometrik Terhadap Perkembangan Riset Dan Perspektif Kesehatan Masyarakat

This Indonesian bibliometric study analyzed global research trends in microplastic contamination of drinking water sources published between 2015 and 2025, finding a sharp increase in publications from 2020 onward, with China and India producing the most research. The analysis maps the key topics and research clusters driving this field. Understanding where the science is concentrated helps identify gaps — particularly in regions with limited monitoring infrastructure where drinking water contamination poses the greatest public health risk.

Share this paper