We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Research landscape of a global environmental challenge: Microplastics
Summary
This bibliometric analysis mapped global microplastic research output, finding a sharp increase in publications since 2006 and identifying China, the USA, and Germany as the most prolific contributors. The study distinguishes between primary microplastics (industrially produced) and secondary microplastics (formed by fragmentation) and contextualizes their global distribution.
Microplastics can be found all over the world, in the remotest regions and even in the Arctic snow. Primary microplastic is either produced as microparticles or enters the natural environment already as microparticles. Whereas secondary microplastic is generated by fragmentation or abrasion of other products in the natural environment. Both pollute the global ecospheres and even enter the human food chain. This study aims at the evaluation of the global publication output on both types of microplastic referring to absolute and contextual numbers. Only since 2006, the focus on the environmental burden led to an enormous increase of publications on MP. While China, USA and Germany are leading players regarding the absolute numbers, Portugal, Chile and Ireland are among the top countries when including socio-economic features and research expenditures. The responsibility for the big plastic waste producers can be shown by significantly correlating numbers of articles and the plastic waste generation, albeit here China and USA fall behind. However, the biggest producers are not the most affected countries. Despite the strong international interest, our study shows that many countries play no role at all in the publication landscape of MP. For future planning, it is necessary to extend the international collaborations to reach sustainable solutions for the whole planet earth.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
From nanoplastic to microplastic: A bibliometric analysis on the presence of plastic particles in the environment
Researchers performed a bibliometric analysis of 3,820 publications on nanoplastics and microplastics from Web of Science, finding substantial growth in publications since 2009 with the USA and China as top contributors, while identifying gaps in standardized methodology and definitions that complicate cross-study comparisons.
Scientometric Analysis of Microplastics across the Globe
A scientometric analysis of 8257 microplastics publications from 1980-2021 found that the term microplastics as a pollution descriptor emerged in 2004 and publication rates grew dramatically from 2014 onward, with China, USA, Germany, and the UK as leading research nations.
Micro(nano)plastics as Emerging Pollutants in Global Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecosystems: A Bibliometric Analysis
This bibliometric analysis mapped the global landscape of micro- and nanoplastic research in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems using data from major scientific databases. Researchers identified key research trends, leading countries, and the most active institutions contributing to the field. The study reveals that while research output has surged in recent years, significant knowledge gaps remain around nanoplastics and their long-term ecological effects.
Scientometric analysis and scientific trends on microplastics research
Researchers performed a scientometric analysis of microplastics research using 2,872 publications from the Web of Science database spanning 2004 to 2020. The bibliometric analysis mapped contributing countries, institutions, key authors, trending keywords, and future research directions in the field. The study found that microplastics research has grown rapidly, with increasing attention to environmental pollution across various ecosystems.
Scientometric Analysis and Identification of Research Trends in Microplastics Research for 2011-2019
This scientometric analysis of microplastic research from 2011 to 2019 found rapid growth in publications, with China playing a leading role. The review maps research trends and identifies gaps, particularly in understanding human health effects of microplastic exposure.